Never Forever: Why Extending the Term of Protection for Sound Recordings is a Bad Idea
Abstract
This article critically examines the arguments put forward in favour of a term extension of related rights of phonogram producers. The authors conclude that there are no convincing reasons to extend the existing term of protection. The article also explains why the popular argument that a term extension would improve the situation of performers is probably a fallacy.
Intellectuele eigendom, Naburige rechten
Bibtex
Article{nokey,
title = {Never Forever: Why Extending the Term of Protection for Sound Recordings is a Bad Idea},
author = {Helberger, N. and van Gompel, S. and Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EIPR_2008_5.pdf},
year = {0604},
date = {2008-06-04},
journal = {European Intellectual Property Review},
number = {5},
abstract = {This article critically examines the arguments put forward in favour of a term extension of related rights of phonogram producers. The authors conclude that there are no convincing reasons to extend the existing term of protection. The article also explains why the popular argument that a term extension would improve the situation of performers is probably a fallacy.},
keywords = {Intellectuele eigendom, Naburige rechten},
}