Annotatie Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 14 februari 2023 (Luxleaks) download

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, iss. : 11, num: 108, pp: 2760-2762, 2024

Freedom of Speech, klokkenluiders

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Annotatie Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 14 februari 2023 (Luxleaks)}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/annotatie-europees-hof-voor-de-rechten-van-de-mens-14-februari-2024-luxleaks/annotatie_nj_2024_108/}, year = {2024}, date = {2024-04-25}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, issue = {11}, number = {108}, keywords = {Freedom of Speech, klokkenluiders}, }

Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe external link

forthcoming in J. Polonetsky, O. Tene, E. Selinger (ed.), Cambridge Handbook of Consumer Privacy, 2017, 0302

Abstract

In this chapter we discuss the relation between privacy and freedom of expression in Europe. In principle, the two rights have equal weight in Europe – which right prevails depends on the circumstances of a case. We use the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, sometimes called the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment, to illustrate the difficulties when balancing the two rights. The court decided in Google Spain that people have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. We discuss how Google and Data Protection Authorities deal with such delisting requests in practice. Delisting requests illustrate that balancing privacy and freedom of expression interests will always remain difficult.

Criminal Conviction, Dutch Law, Freedom of expression, Freedom of Speech, frontpage, Personal data, Privacy, right to be forgotten, Search Engine, Sensitive Data, Special Categories of Data

Bibtex

Chapter{Kulk2017, title = {Privacy, Freedom of Expression, and the Right to Be Forgotten in Europe}, author = {Kulk, S. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2923722}, year = {0302}, date = {2017-03-02}, abstract = {In this chapter we discuss the relation between privacy and freedom of expression in Europe. In principle, the two rights have equal weight in Europe – which right prevails depends on the circumstances of a case. We use the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, sometimes called the ‘right to be forgotten’ judgment, to illustrate the difficulties when balancing the two rights. The court decided in Google Spain that people have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. We discuss how Google and Data Protection Authorities deal with such delisting requests in practice. Delisting requests illustrate that balancing privacy and freedom of expression interests will always remain difficult.}, keywords = {Criminal Conviction, Dutch Law, Freedom of expression, Freedom of Speech, frontpage, Personal data, Privacy, right to be forgotten, Search Engine, Sensitive Data, Special Categories of Data}, }