Differences in mobile health app use: A source of new digital inequalities? external link

Bol, N., Helberger, N. & Weert, J.C.M.
The Information Society, vol. 2018, num: 3, 2018

Abstract

This article provides a more differentiated understanding of mobile health consumers, and considers whether health app use may contribute to new digital inequalities. It focuses on factors associated with mobile health app use, and identifies which factors explain the use of different types of health apps. Data from a large representative sample of the Dutch population (N = 1,079) show that mobile health app users were generally younger, higher educated, and had higher levels of e-health literacy skills than non-users. Interestingly, different usage patterns were found for specific types of health apps. Theory and policy implications are discussed.

digital inequalities, e-health, frontpage, mobile health apps, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{Bol2018, title = {Differences in mobile health app use: A source of new digital inequalities?}, author = {Bol, N. and Helberger, N. and Weert, J.C.M.}, url = {https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/01972243.2018.1438550}, year = {0501}, date = {2018-05-01}, journal = {The Information Society}, volume = {2018}, number = {3}, pages = {}, abstract = {This article provides a more differentiated understanding of mobile health consumers, and considers whether health app use may contribute to new digital inequalities. It focuses on factors associated with mobile health app use, and identifies which factors explain the use of different types of health apps. Data from a large representative sample of the Dutch population (N = 1,079) show that mobile health app users were generally younger, higher educated, and had higher levels of e-health literacy skills than non-users. Interestingly, different usage patterns were found for specific types of health apps. Theory and policy implications are discussed.}, keywords = {digital inequalities, e-health, frontpage, mobile health apps, Privacy}, }

Annotatie bij EHRM 5 september 2017 (Barbulescu / Roemenië) external link

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2018, num: 15, pp: 2021-2023, 2018

e-mail, frontpage, Privacy, werkplek

Bibtex

Article{Dommering2018f, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 5 september 2017 (Barbulescu / Roemenië)}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2018_137.pdf}, year = {0417}, date = {2018-04-17}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, volume = {2018}, number = {15}, pages = {2021-2023}, keywords = {e-mail, frontpage, Privacy, werkplek}, }

The Right to Communications Confidentiality in Europe: Protecting Trust, Privacy, and Freedom of Expression external link

Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. & Steenbruggen, W.
vol. 2018, 2018

Abstract

In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides comprehensive rules for the processing of personal data. In addition, the EU lawmaker intends to adopt specific rules to protect confidentiality of communications, in a separate ePrivacy Regulation. Some have argued that there is no need for such additional rules for communications confidentiality. This paper discusses the protection of the right to confidentiality of communications in Europe. We look at the right’s origins as a fundamental right to assess the rationale for protecting the right. We also analyse how the right is currently protected under the European Convention on Human Rights and under EU law. We show that the right to communications confidentiality protects three values: trust in communication services, privacy, and freedom of expression. The right aims to ensure that individuals and businesses can safely entrust communication to service providers. Initially, the right protected only postal letters, but it has gradually developed into a strong safeguard for the protection of confidentiality of communications, regardless of the technology used. Hence, the right does not merely serve individual privacy interests, but also other interests that are crucial for the functioning of our information society. We conclude that separate EU rules to protect communications confidentiality, next to the GDPR, are justified and necessary to protect trust, privacy and freedom and expression.

Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, confidentiality, ECHR, frontpage, GDP, Privacy, Telecommunications law

Bibtex

Article{Borgesius2018b, title = {The Right to Communications Confidentiality in Europe: Protecting Trust, Privacy, and Freedom of Expression}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. and Steenbruggen, W.}, url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3152014}, year = {0406}, date = {2018-04-06}, volume = {2018}, pages = {}, abstract = {In the European Union, the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) provides comprehensive rules for the processing of personal data. In addition, the EU lawmaker intends to adopt specific rules to protect confidentiality of communications, in a separate ePrivacy Regulation. Some have argued that there is no need for such additional rules for communications confidentiality. This paper discusses the protection of the right to confidentiality of communications in Europe. We look at the right’s origins as a fundamental right to assess the rationale for protecting the right. We also analyse how the right is currently protected under the European Convention on Human Rights and under EU law. We show that the right to communications confidentiality protects three values: trust in communication services, privacy, and freedom of expression. The right aims to ensure that individuals and businesses can safely entrust communication to service providers. Initially, the right protected only postal letters, but it has gradually developed into a strong safeguard for the protection of confidentiality of communications, regardless of the technology used. Hence, the right does not merely serve individual privacy interests, but also other interests that are crucial for the functioning of our information society. We conclude that separate EU rules to protect communications confidentiality, next to the GDPR, are justified and necessary to protect trust, privacy and freedom and expression.}, keywords = {Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, confidentiality, ECHR, frontpage, GDP, Privacy, Telecommunications law}, }

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 9 maart 2017 (Camera di Commercio / S. Manni) external link

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2018, num: 14, pp: 1796-1797, 2018

Annotaties, frontpage, Persoonsgegevens, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{Dommering2018e, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 9 maart 2017 (Camera di Commercio / S. Manni)}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2018_124.pdf}, year = {0403}, date = {2018-04-03}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, volume = {2018}, number = {14}, pages = {1796-1797}, keywords = {Annotaties, frontpage, Persoonsgegevens, Privacy}, }

Deskundigenbericht: Juridische grondslag multilaterale informatie-uitwisseling external link

van Eijk, N. & Ryngaert, C.M.J.
vol. 2018, 2018

frontpage, gegevensuitwisseling, Mensenrechten, Privacy, toezicht, veiligheidsdiensten

Bibtex

Article{vanEijk2018e, title = {Deskundigenbericht: Juridische grondslag multilaterale informatie-uitwisseling}, author = {van Eijk, N. and Ryngaert, C.M.J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Deskundigenbericht.pdf}, year = {0403}, date = {2018-04-03}, volume = {2018}, pages = {}, keywords = {frontpage, gegevensuitwisseling, Mensenrechten, Privacy, toezicht, veiligheidsdiensten}, }

Bewuste digitale keuze is voor gebruiker belangrijker dan ooit: Noodzakelijke internationale consensus over digitale innovatie steeds lastiger te realiseren external link

Het Financieele Dagblad, vol. 2017, 2018

digitale innovatie, Informatierecht, nepnieuws, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{Arnbak2018d, title = {Bewuste digitale keuze is voor gebruiker belangrijker dan ooit: Noodzakelijke internationale consensus over digitale innovatie steeds lastiger te realiseren}, author = {Arnbak, A.}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/2018/01/26/43e-fd-column-bewuste-digitale-keuze-is-voor-gebruiker-belangrijker-dan-ooit/}, year = {0326}, date = {2018-03-26}, journal = {Het Financieele Dagblad}, volume = {2017}, pages = {}, keywords = {digitale innovatie, Informatierecht, nepnieuws, Privacy}, }

Machtspositie Nederland belangrijke drijfveer controversiële internettap external link

Het Financieele Dagblad, vol. 2018, 2018

aftappen, Privacy, referendum, veiligheid, Wet op de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten (Wiv)

Bibtex

Article{Arnbak2018c, title = {Machtspositie Nederland belangrijke drijfveer controversiële internettap}, author = {Arnbak, A.}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/2018/01/26/44e-fd-column-machtspositie-nederland-belangrijke-drijfveer-voor-controversiele-internettap/}, year = {0326}, date = {2018-03-26}, journal = {Het Financieele Dagblad}, volume = {2018}, pages = {}, keywords = {aftappen, Privacy, referendum, veiligheid, Wet op de inlichtingen- en veiligheidsdiensten (Wiv)}, }

De zeven privacytrends van 2017 external link

Mediaforum, vol. 2018, num: 1, pp: 2-5, 2018

Abstract

Het is drie jaar geleden dat Mediaforum een overzicht van tien privacytrends publiceerde. Toen was de Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming (AVG) nog niet aangenomen, lag Snowden nog fris in het geheugen en heette de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) nog het College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens. Privacyrecht was ook toen al best belangrijk, maar de aandacht voor dit vakgebied is in de afgelopen jaren behoorlijk gegroeid. Dus laten we de vraag opnieuw stellen: wat is er de afgelopen tijd gebeurd op privacygebied, en vallen daarin grote lijnen te ontwaren?

frontpage, Privacy, trends

Bibtex

Article{vanDaalen2018, title = {De zeven privacytrends van 2017}, author = {van Daalen, O.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Mediaforum_2018_1.pdf}, year = {0322}, date = {2018-03-22}, journal = {Mediaforum}, volume = {2018}, number = {1}, pages = {2-5}, abstract = {Het is drie jaar geleden dat Mediaforum een overzicht van tien privacytrends publiceerde. Toen was de Algemene Verordening Gegevensbescherming (AVG) nog niet aangenomen, lag Snowden nog fris in het geheugen en heette de Autoriteit Persoonsgegevens (AP) nog het College Bescherming Persoonsgegevens. Privacyrecht was ook toen al best belangrijk, maar de aandacht voor dit vakgebied is in de afgelopen jaren behoorlijk gegroeid. Dus laten we de vraag opnieuw stellen: wat is er de afgelopen tijd gebeurd op privacygebied, en vallen daarin grote lijnen te ontwaren?}, keywords = {frontpage, Privacy, trends}, }

Annotatie bij EHRM 27 juni 2017 (Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy & Satamedia Oy / Finland) external link

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, vol. 2018, num: 8, pp: 984-987, 2018

Abstract

In Finland mogen openbare fiscale inkomensgegevens niet onbeperkt worden gepubliceerd: er moet een afweging plaatsvinden welk algemeen belang daarmee is gediend. Deze afweging is vergelijkbaar met die voor algemene privacy inbreuken door de pers geldt.

Annotaties, Art. 10 EVRM, frontpage, Privacy, publiek debat, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{Dommering2018c, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 27 juni 2017 (Satakunnan Markkinapörssi Oy & Satamedia Oy / Finland)}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2018_67.pdf}, year = {0313}, date = {2018-03-13}, journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie}, volume = {2018}, number = {8}, pages = {984-987}, abstract = {In Finland mogen openbare fiscale inkomensgegevens niet onbeperkt worden gepubliceerd: er moet een afweging plaatsvinden welk algemeen belang daarmee is gediend. Deze afweging is vergelijkbaar met die voor algemene privacy inbreuken door de pers geldt.}, keywords = {Annotaties, Art. 10 EVRM, frontpage, Privacy, publiek debat, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

De Intocht van Boniklasius in Dokkum, dertien eeuwen later external link

Mediaforum, vol. 2017, num: 7/8, pp: 217, 2018

demonstraties, frontpage, openbare orde, Privacy, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{Dommering2018b, title = {De Intocht van Boniklasius in Dokkum, dertien eeuwen later}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Mediaforum_2017_7_8_opinie.pdf}, year = {0213}, date = {2018-02-13}, journal = {Mediaforum}, volume = {2017}, number = {7/8}, pages = {217}, keywords = {demonstraties, frontpage, openbare orde, Privacy, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }