Auteursrecht, frontpage, GS Media / Sanoma uitspraak, Hof van Justitie, hyperlinken
Article{vanEechoud2016b,
title = {Hof van Justitie legt bom onder het internet},
author = {van Eechoud, M. and Poort, J.},
url = {http://njb.nl/blog/hof-van-justitie-legt-bom-onder-het-internet.20720.lynkx},
year = {1027},
date = {2016-10-27},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, GS Media / Sanoma uitspraak, Hof van Justitie, hyperlinken},
} Art. 10 EVRM, Auteursrecht, auteursrechtrichtlijn, Grote Kamer, Politieke spotprent, uitleg parodie-exceptie, Vrijheid van meningsuiting
Article{Breemen2014,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen)},
author = {Breemen, J.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/ehrc-2014-12-annotatie-deckmynvandersteen-j-m-breemen/},
year = {1210},
date = {2014-12-10},
journal = {European Human Rights Cases},
volume = {15},
number = {12},
pages = {657-662},
abstract = {Grote Kamer. Auteursrecht. Uitleg parodie-exceptie. Vrijheid van meningsuiting. Politieke spotprent. Richtlijn 2001/29/EG art. 2, 3, 5 lid 3 (k). EVRM art. 10 lid 1 en 2.},
keywords = {Art. 10 EVRM, Auteursrecht, auteursrechtrichtlijn, Grote Kamer, Politieke spotprent, uitleg parodie-exceptie, Vrijheid van meningsuiting},
} Auteursrecht, frontpage, harmonisatie van de wetgevingen, Naburige rechten, privé kopie, reproductierecht, vergoedingen
Article{Hugenholtz2016b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 12 november 2015 (HP Belgium / Reprobel)},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_370.pdf},
year = {1018},
date = {2016-10-18},
journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},
number = {39},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, harmonisatie van de wetgevingen, Naburige rechten, privé kopie, reproductierecht, vergoedingen},
} Auteursrecht, Technologie en recht
Online publication{Caspers2016b,
title = {The role of Anne Frank’s diary and academic freedom for text & data mining},
author = {Caspers, M.},
url = {http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/01/20/the-role-of-anne-franks-diary-and-academic-freedom-for-text-data-mining/},
year = {0120},
date = {2016-01-20},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Technologie en recht},
} Auteursrecht, Technologie en recht
Online publication{Caspers2016,
title = {The Commission’s proposed TDM exception: Who’s to benefit?},
author = {Caspers, M.},
url = {http://kluwercopyrightblog.com/2016/09/15/commissions-proposed-tdm-exception-whos-benefit/},
year = {0915},
date = {2016-09-15},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Technologie en recht},
} aggregation, Auteursrecht, Berne Convention, communication to the public, Copyright, frontpage, hyperlinking, new public
Article{Hugenholtz2016b,
title = {Communication to a New Public? Three reasons why EU copyright law can do without a ‘new public’},
author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Velze, S.C. van},
url = {http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-016-0512-7?wt_mc=Internal.Event.1.SEM.ArticleAuthorAssignedToIssue},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-016-0512-7},
year = {1118},
date = {2016-11-18},
journal = {IIC (International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law)},
volume = {47},
number = {7},
pages = {797-816},
abstract = {This article critically examines the \'new public\' test in EU copyright law, which was developed by the CJEU interpreting the right of communication to the public in cases of retransmission and hyperlinking. As the authors seek to demonstrate, this test is flawed for at least three reasons: historical, conceptual and economic. EU copyright law can do well without a \'new public\' test.},
keywords = {aggregation, Auteursrecht, Berne Convention, communication to the public, Copyright, frontpage, hyperlinking, new public},
} Auteursrecht, beperkingen, frontpage, Naburige rechten, parodie, reproductierecht
Article{Hugenholtz2016b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie van de EU 3 september 2014 (Deckmyn / Vandersteen c.s.)},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2016_351.pdf},
year = {1006},
date = {2016-10-06},
journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},
number = {37},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, beperkingen, frontpage, Naburige rechten, parodie, reproductierecht},
} Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom
Article{nokey,
title = {Auteursrechtdebat: De ontvlochten uitgeverij},
author = {Poort, J.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1823},
year = {0809},
date = {2016-08-09},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom},
} Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom
Report{nokey,
title = {Extending the SatCab Model to the Internet},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1822},
year = {1026},
date = {2015-10-26},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom},
} Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom
Other{nokey,
title = {Flexible Copyright. Can EU Author’s Right Accommodate Fair Use?},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1821},
year = {0802},
date = {2016-08-02},
abstract = {Almost everyone agrees that modern copyright law needs to be flexible in order to accommodate rapid technological change and evolving media uses. In the United States fair use is the flexible instrument of choice. Author’s right systems in Europe are generally deemed to be less flexible and less tolerant to open-ended limitations and exceptions. But are they really?
This chapter makes the case that (1) author’s rights systems can be made as flexible as copyright systems, and (2) that the existing EU legal framework does not preclude the development of flexible norms at the national level.},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom},
}