frontpage, kansspelen
Report{nokey,
title = {Inbreng Rondetafelgesprek over de Wet kansspelen op afstand},
author = {Poort, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/inbreng-rondetafel_kansspelen_9juni2022/
https://debatgemist.tweedekamer.nl/debatten/wet-kansspelen-op-afstand},
year = {0609},
date = {2022-06-09},
keywords = {frontpage, kansspelen},
} Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage
Article{nokey,
title = {Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? – Part II},
author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/09/algorithmic-propagation-do-property-rights-in-data-increase-bias-in-content-moderation-part-ii/},
year = {0609},
date = {2022-06-09},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, frontpage},
} algoritmes, Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, Europees recht, frontpage
Article{nokey,
title = {Algorithmic propagation: do property rights in data increase bias in content moderation? Part I},
author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/08/algorithmic-propagation-do-property-rights-in-data-increase-bias-in-content-moderation-part-i/},
year = {0608},
date = {2022-06-08},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {algoritmes, Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Artificial intelligence, Auteursrecht, Europees recht, frontpage},
} Annotaties, Auteursrecht, billijke vergoeding, frontpage, muziek, openbaarmaking
Article{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 12 december 2021 (SENA/Organisatoren Dance Events)},
author = {Poort, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/annotatie_auteursrecht_2022_2/},
year = {0607},
date = {2022-06-07},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
issue = {2},
number = {4},
abstract = {De zaak draait om de hoogte van de billijke vergoeding voor openbaarmaking van commerciële fonogrammen tijdens dance-evenementen. De Hoge Raad bekrachtigt het arrest van het gerechtshof Den Haag, dat tot uitgangspunt had genomen dat tussen de ‘ticketprijs’ en de ‘prijs per bezoeker’ geen recht evenredig verband bestaat.},
keywords = {Annotaties, Auteursrecht, billijke vergoeding, frontpage, muziek, openbaarmaking},
} Auteursrecht, frontpage, muziek, Naburige rechten, streamingdiensten
Article{nokey,
title = {De playlists van Spotify: Hoe ver reikt het nabuurrechtelijke vergoedingsrecht met betrekking tot audiostreamingdiensten?},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/auteursrecht_2022_2/},
year = {0607},
date = {2022-06-07},
journal = {Auteursrecht},
issue = {2},
abstract = {Op grond van art. 7 lid 1 WNR vallen onder het vergoedingsrecht voor ‘secundair gebruik’ alle mogelijke vormen van openbaarmaking van commercieel uitgebrachte fonogrammen, doch niet het online beschikbaar stellen. Algemeen wordt aangenomen dat het vergoedingsrecht niet geldt voor het streamen via Spotify en dergelijke diensten. Maar geldt dat ook voor de door Spotify aangeboden playlists en vergelijkbare omroepachtige diensten? In dit artikel wordt een poging gedaan criteria te formuleren aan de hand waarvan het ‘beschikbaar stellen’ van andere vormen van openbaarmaking kan worden onderscheiden.},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, muziek, Naburige rechten, streamingdiensten},
} frontpage, openbaarheid, Overheidsinformatie, Privacy, transparantie
Article{nokey,
title = {Naar een algemeen transparantiebeginsel? : Bespreking van het preadvies van A.W.G.J. Buijze voor de VAR 2022},
author = {Dommering, E.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/ntb_2022_5_141/},
year = {0607},
date = {2022-06-07},
journal = {Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Bestuursrecht},
issue = {5},
number = {141},
keywords = {frontpage, openbaarheid, Overheidsinformatie, Privacy, transparantie},
} Auteursrecht, frontpage
Article{nokey,
title = {The Meaning of “Additional” in the Poland ruling of the Court of Justice: Double Safeguards – Ex Ante Flagging and Ex Post Complaint Systems – are Indispensable},
author = {Senftleben, M.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2022/06/01/the-meaning-of-additional-in-the-poland-ruling-of-the-court-of-justice-double-safeguards-ex-ante-flagging-and-ex-post-complaint-systems-are-indispensable/},
year = {0602},
date = {2022-06-02},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage},
} blockchain, frontpage, Technologie en recht, trust
Article{nokey,
title = {Maintaining trust in a technologized public sector},
author = {Bodó, B. and Janssen, H.},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/polsoc/puac019},
year = {0519},
date = {2022-05-19},
journal = {Policy and Society},
abstract = {Emerging technologies permeate and potentially disrupt a wide spectrum of our social, economic, and political relations. Various state institutions, including education, law enforcement, and healthcare, increasingly rely on technical components, such as automated decision-making systems, e-government systems, and other digital tools to provide cheap, efficient public services, and supposedly fair, transparent, disinterested, and accountable public administration. The increased interest in various blockchain-based solutions from central bank digital currencies, via tokenized educational credentials, and distributed ledger-based land registries to self-sovereign identities is the latest, still mostly unwritten chapter in a long history of standardized, objectified, automated, technocratic, and technologized public administration. The rapid, (often) unplanned, and uncontrolled technologization of public services (as happened in the hasty adoption of distance-learning and teleconferencing systems during Corona Virus Disease (COVID) lockdowns) raises complex questions about the use of novel technological components, which may or may not be ultimately adequate for the task for which they are used. The question whether we can trust the technical infrastructures the public sector uses when providing public services is a central concern in an age where trust in government is declining: If the government’s artificial intelligence system that detects welfare fraud fails, the public’s confidence in the government is ultimately hit. In this paper, we provide a critical assessment of how the use of potentially untrustworthy (private) technological systems including blockchain-based systems in the public sector may affect trust in government. We then propose several policy options to protect the trust in government even if some of their technological components prove fundamentally untrustworthy.},
keywords = {blockchain, frontpage, Technologie en recht, trust},
} digital platforms, frontpage, Platforms, Technologie en recht
Article{nokey,
title = {The platformisation of digital payments: The fabrication of consumer interest in the EU FinTech agenda},
author = {Ferrari, V.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/computerlawsecurityreview_2022/},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2022.105687},
year = {0519},
date = {2022-05-19},
journal = { Computer Law & Security Review},
volume = {45},
pages = {},
abstract = {This paper investigates, through a qualitative analysis of official documents, how certain imaginaries about technology filter into EU policymaking, allowing or accelerating the transformation of payment infrastructures into the platform economy.
One of the ways in which socio-technical imaginaries filter into policymaking is, it turns out, by informing an image of the consumer which serves to justify measures for the realization of a desired future. In particular, the documents offer a view of the consumer as an actor that is empowered by digitisation. The thesis of this paper is that this view of the consumer is partial: the rhetoric of consumer technological empowerment outweighs and conceals much needed considerations about the vulnerability of consumers vis-a-vis data-intensive payment technologies. Ultimately, the fault lies with the future imaginaries upon which such image is grounded. The vision of the digital payment infrastructure portrayed in the documents is in fact problematic for two reasons. First, the technologies that are portraited as desirable are chosen based on industry interests and trends rather than considerations of benefits and risks that these technologies entail. Secondly, the assumption that a liberalized market will offer more and better choices is flawed, as platformisation entails risks of monopolization and abuses of market power. We suggest that policymakers in this domain should be more critical of the risks entailed by platformisation, and open their imagination to alternative technological futures.},
keywords = {digital platforms, frontpage, Platforms, Technologie en recht},
} Auteursrecht, filters, frontpage, Fundamental rights
Article{nokey,
title = {Between Filters and Fundamental Rights: How the Court of Justice saved Article 17 in C-401/19 – Poland v. Parliament and Council},
author = {Quintais, J.},
url = {https://verfassungsblog.de/filters-poland/?s=09},
year = {0516},
date = {2022-05-16},
journal = {Verfassungsblog},
abstract = {On 26 April 2022, the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU or Court) delivered its much awaited judgement in Case C-401/19 – Poland v Parliament and Council. The case focuses on the validity of Article 17 of the Copyright in the Digital Single Market Directive (CDSMD) in light of fundamental rights. The judgment marks the climax of a turbulent journey in the area of copyright law, with potential implications for the future of platform regulation and content moderation in EU law.},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, filters, frontpage, Fundamental rights},
}