Keyword: Grondrechten

Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights external link

McGonagle, T.
European Audiovisual Observatory, 1023, Series: IRIS Themes, pp: 409

Abstract

This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French.
For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1644.pdf}, year = {1023}, date = {2015-10-23}, abstract = {This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French. For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Privacy Bridges: EU and US Privacy Experts In Search of Transatlantic Privacy Solutions external link

Weitzner, D.J. & van Eijk, N.
2015

Abstract

The EU and US share a common commitment to privacy protection as a cornerstone of democracy. Following the Treaty of Lisbon, data privacy is a fundamental right that the European Union must proactively guarantee. In the United States, data privacy derives from constitutional protections in the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment as well as federal and state statute, consumer protection law and common law. The ultimate goal of effective privacy protection is shared. However, current friction between the two legal systems poses challenges to realizing privacy and the free flow of information across the Atlantic. Recent expansion of online surveillance practices underline these challenges. Over nine months, the group prepared a consensus report outlining a menu of privacy “bridges” that can be built to bring the European Union and the United States closer together. The efforts are aimed at providing a framework of practical options that advance strong, globally-accepted privacy values in a manner that respects the substantive and procedural differences between the two jurisdictions. The report will be presented at the 2015 International Conference of Privacy and Data Protection Commissioners, which the Dutch Data Protection Authority will host in Amsterdam on 28-29 October 2015.

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Privacy Bridges: EU and US Privacy Experts In Search of Transatlantic Privacy Solutions}, author = {Weitzner, D.J. and van Eijk, N.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1640.pdf}, year = {1021}, date = {2015-10-21}, abstract = {The EU and US share a common commitment to privacy protection as a cornerstone of democracy. Following the Treaty of Lisbon, data privacy is a fundamental right that the European Union must proactively guarantee. In the United States, data privacy derives from constitutional protections in the First, Fourth and Fifth Amendment as well as federal and state statute, consumer protection law and common law. The ultimate goal of effective privacy protection is shared. However, current friction between the two legal systems poses challenges to realizing privacy and the free flow of information across the Atlantic. Recent expansion of online surveillance practices underline these challenges. Over nine months, the group prepared a consensus report outlining a menu of privacy “bridges” that can be built to bring the European Union and the United States closer together. The efforts are aimed at providing a framework of practical options that advance strong, globally-accepted privacy values in a manner that respects the substantive and procedural differences between the two jurisdictions. The report will be presented at the 2015 International Conference of Privacy and Data Protection Commissioners, which the Dutch Data Protection Authority will host in Amsterdam on 28-29 October 2015.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges external link

McGonagle, T.
2015

Abstract

This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced  by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {http://play.webvideocore.net/popplayer.php?it=55i5kw2syio0&is_link=1&w=720&h=405&pause=1&title=1502002+-+Tarlach+McGonagle+Interview+-+ENG&skin=3&repeat=&brandNW=1&start_volume=100&bg_gradient1=&bg_gradient2=&fullscreen=&fs_mode=0&skinAlpha=80&colorBase=%}, year = {1009}, date = {2015-10-09}, abstract = {This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced  by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Datatransport – Hof EU nog steeds niet volwassen external link

Arnbak, A.
2015

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Datatransport – Hof EU nog steeds niet volwassen}, author = {Arnbak, A.}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2015/10/07/15e-column-financieele-dagblad-datatransport-hof-eu-nog-steeds-niet-volwassen/}, year = {1009}, date = {2015-10-09}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Freedom of Expression and ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain external link

Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
European Data Protection Law Review, num: 2, pp: 113-125., 2015

Abstract

Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions.

Data protection law, european court of justice, Freedom of expression, google spain, Grondrechten, Privacy, right to be delisted, right to be forgotten, search engines, the netherlands, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Freedom of Expression and ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2652171}, year = {0917}, date = {2015-09-17}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, abstract = {Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions.}, keywords = {Data protection law, european court of justice, Freedom of expression, google spain, Grondrechten, Privacy, right to be delisted, right to be forgotten, search engines, the netherlands, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland) external link

van der Sloot, B.
European Human Rights Cases, num: 9, 2015

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1622.pdf}, year = {0911}, date = {2015-09-11}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {9}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }