Trade and privacy: complicated bedfellows? How to achieve data protection-proof free trade agreements external link

Irion, K., Yakovleva, S. & Bartl, M.
2016

Abstract

Study commissioned by the European Consumer Organisation/Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC), Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), The Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) and European Digital Rights (EDRi), 13 July 2016, Amsterdam. The results of the study were widely covered in the Dutch and European media: ‘Privacy onvoldoende gewaarborgd in handelsverdragen EU‘, nu.nl, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Digital Telegraaf, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Einhovens Dagblad, 13 juli 2016 Monika Ermert, ‘Transatlantischer Zoff: Digitaler Datenschutz oder digitaler Protektionismus?‘, 16 July 2016, heise.de Léa Auffret, ‘Why privacy safeguards in trade deals need urgent improvement‘, 20 October 2016, beuc.eu

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Trade and privacy: complicated bedfellows? How to achieve data protection-proof free trade agreements}, author = {Irion, K. and Yakovleva, S. and Bartl, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/trade_and_privacy.pdf}, year = {0714}, date = {2016-07-14}, abstract = {Study commissioned by the European Consumer Organisation/Bureau Européen des Unions de Consommateurs (BEUC), Center for Digital Democracy (CDD), The Transatlantic Consumer Dialogue (TACD) and European Digital Rights (EDRi), 13 July 2016, Amsterdam. The results of the study were widely covered in the Dutch and European media: ‘Privacy onvoldoende gewaarborgd in handelsverdragen EU‘, nu.nl, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Digital Telegraaf, 13 juli 2016 ‘EU stelt privacy burgers onvoldoende veilig‘, Einhovens Dagblad, 13 juli 2016 Monika Ermert, ‘Transatlantischer Zoff: Digitaler Datenschutz oder digitaler Protektionismus?‘, 16 July 2016, heise.de Léa Auffret, ‘Why privacy safeguards in trade deals need urgent improvement‘, 20 October 2016, beuc.eu}, keywords = {frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Chefsache: Bestuurders aansprakelijk na ernstige cyberaanval external link

2016

Bescherming van communicatie, frontpage, Grondrechten

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Chefsache: Bestuurders aansprakelijk na ernstige cyberaanval}, author = {Arnbak, A.}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/FD24.pdf}, year = {0617}, date = {2016-06-17}, keywords = {Bescherming van communicatie, frontpage, Grondrechten}, }

Nieuw toezicht: Stortvloed aan data schreeuwt om ingrijpen external link

2016

Bescherming van communicatie, frontpage, Grondrechten

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Nieuw toezicht: Stortvloed aan data schreeuwt om ingrijpen}, author = {Arnbak, A.}, url = {https://axelarnbak.nl/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/FD23.pdf}, year = {0520}, date = {2016-05-20}, keywords = {Bescherming van communicatie, frontpage, Grondrechten}, }

Netherlands: New Notification Obligations and Fines under the Dutch Data Protection Act external link

European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 2, num: 2, pp: 224-226, 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Netherlands: New Notification Obligations and Fines under the Dutch Data Protection Act}, author = {Eskens, S.}, url = {http://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2016/2/12}, year = {0701}, date = {2016-07-01}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, volume = {2}, number = {2}, pages = {224-226}, keywords = {frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Annotatie bij EHRM 4 december 2015 (Roman Zakharov/Rusland) external link

Computerrecht, vol. 2016, num: 3, pp: 178-189, 2016

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 4 december 2015 (Roman Zakharov/Rusland)}, author = {Eskens, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1801}, year = {0701}, date = {2016-07-01}, journal = {Computerrecht}, volume = {2016}, number = {3}, pages = {178-189}, keywords = {frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Oneerlijke handelspraktijken: alternatief voor privacyhandhaving external link

Mediaforum, num: 4, pp: 102-109., 2016

Abstract

Privacyhandhaving vindt in Europa vrijwel uitsluitend plaats door nationale privacytoezichthouders. Zij passen primair sectorspecifieke regulering toe gebaseerd op de Europese Privacyrichtlijn.2 De verantwoordelijkheid ligt primair bij de onafhankelijke nationale privacytoezichthouders. In de Verenigde Staten wordt op federaal niveau privacy vooral gehandhaafd door de Federal Trade Commission op basis van algemene regels inzake misleidende en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. In dit artikel wordt het Amerikaanse systeem besproken en naast de Europese kaders gezet. Hieruit blijkt dat ook in Europa de regels over handelspraktijken kunnen worden ingezet voor privacyhandhaving. Er zijn goede argumenten om dit ook te doen: veel fricties betreffen het op markt/consumenten-gericht gebruik van persoonsgegevens. Het ligt dan voor de hand om deze fricties dan ook binnen markt/consument kaders aan de orde te stellen.

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Oneerlijke handelspraktijken: alternatief voor privacyhandhaving}, author = {Kannekens, E. and van Eijk, N.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1800}, year = {0624}, date = {2016-06-24}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {4}, abstract = {Privacyhandhaving vindt in Europa vrijwel uitsluitend plaats door nationale privacytoezichthouders. Zij passen primair sectorspecifieke regulering toe gebaseerd op de Europese Privacyrichtlijn.2 De verantwoordelijkheid ligt primair bij de onafhankelijke nationale privacytoezichthouders. In de Verenigde Staten wordt op federaal niveau privacy vooral gehandhaafd door de Federal Trade Commission op basis van algemene regels inzake misleidende en oneerlijke handelspraktijken. In dit artikel wordt het Amerikaanse systeem besproken en naast de Europese kaders gezet. Hieruit blijkt dat ook in Europa de regels over handelspraktijken kunnen worden ingezet voor privacyhandhaving. Er zijn goede argumenten om dit ook te doen: veel fricties betreffen het op markt/consumenten-gericht gebruik van persoonsgegevens. Het ligt dan voor de hand om deze fricties dan ook binnen markt/consument kaders aan de orde te stellen.}, keywords = {frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

The Best of Both Worlds? Free Trade in Services and EU Law on Privacy and Data Protection external link

European Data Protection Law Review, num: 2, pp: 191-208., 2016

Abstract

The article focuses on the interplay between European Union (EU) law on privacy and data protection and international trade law, in particular the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the WTO dispute settlement system. The argument distinguishes between the effects of international trade law in the EU legal order on the one hand, and, on the other hand, how EU data protection law would fare in a hypothetical challenge under the GATS. The contribution will apply international trade law and the general exception in GATS Article XIV to typical requirements stemming from EU data protection law, especially on transfers of personal data to third countries. The article enumerates the specific legal risks for defending EU law on privacy and data protection and explains the practical implications of its hypothetical challenge under the GATS. These insights could be useful for the EU’s negotiators of the future bi- or multilateral free trade agreements, notably the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Trade in Services Agreement.

frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {The Best of Both Worlds? Free Trade in Services and EU Law on Privacy and Data Protection}, author = {Yakovleva, S. and Irion, K.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/irion_yakovleva-2016-the-best-of-both-worlds/}, year = {0624}, date = {2016-06-24}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, abstract = {The article focuses on the interplay between European Union (EU) law on privacy and data protection and international trade law, in particular the General Agreement on Trade in Services (GATS) and the WTO dispute settlement system. The argument distinguishes between the effects of international trade law in the EU legal order on the one hand, and, on the other hand, how EU data protection law would fare in a hypothetical challenge under the GATS. The contribution will apply international trade law and the general exception in GATS Article XIV to typical requirements stemming from EU data protection law, especially on transfers of personal data to third countries. The article enumerates the specific legal risks for defending EU law on privacy and data protection and explains the practical implications of its hypothetical challenge under the GATS. These insights could be useful for the EU’s negotiators of the future bi- or multilateral free trade agreements, notably the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership and the Trade in Services Agreement.}, keywords = {frontpage, Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation external link

frontpage, Grondrechten, handhaving, zelfregulering

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Study of fundamental rights limitations for online enforcement through self-regulation}, author = {Hins, A. and Hugenholtz, P. and McGonagle, T. and van Daalen, O. and van Hoboken, J. and Angelopoulos, C. and Brody, A. and Margoni, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/study_fundamental_rights_limitations.pdf}, year = {0616}, date = {2016-06-16}, keywords = {frontpage, Grondrechten, handhaving, zelfregulering}, }