Private Copying and Downloading from Unlawful Sources external link

IIC - International Review of Intellectual Property and Competition Law, vol. 46, num: 1, pp: 66-92, 2014

Abstract

Private copying is one of the most contested areas of EU copyright law. This paper surveys that nebulous area and examines the issue of copies made from unlawful sources in light of the ECJ’s ACI Adam decision. After describing the legal background of copyright levies and the facts of the litigation, the paper scrutinizes the Advocate General’s Opinion and the Court’s decision. The latter is analyzed against the history of copyright levies, the ECJ’s extensive case-law on the private copying limitation and Member States’ regulation of unlawful sources. This paper further reflects on the decision’s implications for end-users, rights holders, collective management organizations and manufacturers/importers of levied goods. It concludes that, from a legal and economic standpoint, the decision not only fails to be properly justified, but its consequences will likely diverge from those anticipated by the Court. Most worrisome is the Court’s stance on the three-step test, which it views as a restrictive, rather than enabling, clause. In its interpretation of the test, the decision fails to strike the necessary balance between competing rights and interests. This is due to multiple factors: overreliance on the principle of strict interpretation; failure to consider the fundamental right of privacy; lack of justification of the normative and empirical elements of the test’s second condition; and a disregard for the remuneration element in connection with the test’s third condition. To the contrary, it is argued that a flexible construction of the three-step test is more suited to the Infosoc Directive’s balancing aims.

ACI ADAM, alternative compensation systems, Auteursrecht, collective rights management, content flat-rate, Copyright, exceptions and limitations, Information Influx Conference, Infosoc Directive, Intellectuele eigendom, IViR, levies, private copy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Legalizing File-Sharing: An Idea Whose Time Has Come – Or Gone? Report from the Information Influx Conference 2014 external link

Abstract

On 2-4 July 2014 Information Influx, the 25th anniversary conference of the Institute for Information Law (IViR) was held in Amsterdam. Integrated in the conference, on Friday, 4 July a panel entitled “Legalizing file-sharing: an idea whose time has come – or gone?” met.<br /> The panel’s moderator was Professor Bernt Hugenholtz (University of Amsterdam, IViR) and the panelists were scholars with groundbreaking research on the topic for the past decade: Professor Neil Netanel (University of California, Los Angeles), Professor Alexander Peukert (University of Frankfurt), Dr. Philippe Aigrain (La Quadrature du Net), Professor Séverine Dusollier (SciencesPo./École de droit).<br /> The panel was divided into four parts, which this report reflects. First, the moderator introduced the topic and the panelists. Second, IViR member Mr. Balázs Bodó offered a short presentation of an ongoing research project on the topic of debate. Third, each panelist commented on the topic from different perspectives. The panel discussion was then opened for comments from the audience and responses from the panel.

ACI ADAM, alternative compensation systems, Auteursrecht, collective rights management, content flat-rate, Copyright, exceptions and limitations, Information Influx Conference, Infosoc Directive, Intellectuele eigendom, IViR, levies, private copy

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Tijd voor meer legale popcorn external link

IE-Forum, num: 14277, 2014

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

‘Ontmoeting en debat’: Bibliotheekwet versus Auteurswet in het digitale domein external link

AMI, num: 5, pp: 139-145., 2014

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Het proceskostenrisico in IE-zaken: Een empirisch onderzoek naar toepassing van de indicatietarieven external link

van Gompel, S.
AMI, num: 5, pp: 133-138., 2014

Abstract

De proceskostenveroordeling in IE-zaken veroorzaakt in de praktijk de nodige onrust, onzekerheid en frustratie. De rechterlijke macht heeft weliswaar indicatietarieven voor IE-zaken opgesteld, maar in de praktijk leggen rechters deze tarieven soms naast zich neer, zonder die beslissing altijd met duidelijke redenen te omkleden. Dit artikel beoogt meer inzicht te geven in de toepassing van de indicatietarieven en het proceskostenrisico in IE-zaken. Daartoe wordt empirisch onderzocht wanneer en op welke manier de indicatietarieven door rechters worden toegepast en om welke redenen deze tarieven in individuele gevallen juist niet worden nagevolgd.

Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Elvis is Returning to the Building: Understanding a Decline in Unauthorized File Sharing external link

2014

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

De lokroep van open data external link

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Trouver le diamant dans la mine de données ou les implications juridiques de l’exploration de données external link

Documentalist-Sciences de l'Information, num: 2, pp: 23-25, 2014

Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

De NSA-affaire en de grenzen van de macht: Naar een wederkerig begrip van privacy external link

Filosofie &amp; Praktijk, num: 2, pp: 49-66., 2014

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib

Are blocking injunctions against ISPs allowed in Europe? Copyright enforcement in the post-Telekabel EU legal landscape external link

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, num: 10, pp: 812-821., 2014

Abstract

In recent years, the national courts of the EU Member States, in an attempt to stem the flow of rampant online copyright infringement, have increasingly turned to the issuance of blocking injunctions against the intermediaries whose websites and networks are used by third parties to commit infringements. This article examines the legal framework in place at the EU level with regard to the legality of such injunctive orders, making a distinction between filtering measures, used to detect copyright infringements, and blocking measures, used to put an end to them. On the basis of that analysis, a detailed examination will be made of the latest CJEU ruling to apply this framework, Case C-314/12, UPC Telekabel Wien GmbH v Constantin Film Verleih GmbH on the lawfullness of open-ended blocking injunctions against internet access providers.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

RIS

Save .RIS

Bibtex

Save .bib