Keyword: Intellectuele eigendom

Making Broadcasts Accessible Online- A Study on the Copyright- Related Environment and Industry Practice external link

Schroff, S.
2017

Abstract

This presentation summarises the methodological innovations and the key empirical results of the NWO-funded 'Images for the Future: from digitization to dissemination, when can we watch?' project.

archive, audio-visual works, Auteursrecht, Copyright, cultural heritage, Intellectuele eigendom, making available, public service broadcasting

Bibtex

Presentation{Schroff2017c, title = {Making Broadcasts Accessible Online- A Study on the Copyright- Related Environment and Industry Practice}, author = {Schroff, S.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/ava_net-presentation/}, year = {0519}, date = {2017-05-19}, abstract = {This presentation summarises the methodological innovations and the key empirical results of the NWO-funded \'Images for the Future: from digitization to dissemination, when can we watch?\' project.}, keywords = {archive, audio-visual works, Auteursrecht, Copyright, cultural heritage, Intellectuele eigendom, making available, public service broadcasting}, }

Een uitgeversrecht voor pluriforme media? external link

van Eechoud, M.
AMI, num: 6, pp: 16-23, 2017

Abstract

Volgens de Europese Commissie hebben we een nieuw intellectueel eigendomsrecht nodig op perspublicaties. Dit artikel neemt het belangrijkste argument voor de introductie van zo’n recht kritisch onder de loep: dat het zal bijdragen aan een pluriforme kwaliteitspers. Daarnaast werpt het een blik op de effecten die het nieuwe recht heeft op de positie van makers, met name freelance journalisten en andere auteurs. De conclusie is dat dit onderdeel van de geplande Richtlijn Auteursrecht in de digitale eengemaakte markt (‘DSM-richtlijn’) terug moet naar de tekentafel, of liever nog de prullenbak in.

frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom, Journalistiek, media, pers, uitgeversrecht

Bibtex

Article{vanEechoud2017b, title = {Een uitgeversrecht voor pluriforme media?}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AMI_2016_6.pdf}, year = {0425}, date = {2017-04-25}, journal = {AMI}, number = {6}, abstract = {Volgens de Europese Commissie hebben we een nieuw intellectueel eigendomsrecht nodig op perspublicaties. Dit artikel neemt het belangrijkste argument voor de introductie van zo’n recht kritisch onder de loep: dat het zal bijdragen aan een pluriforme kwaliteitspers. Daarnaast werpt het een blik op de effecten die het nieuwe recht heeft op de positie van makers, met name freelance journalisten en andere auteurs. De conclusie is dat dit onderdeel van de geplande Richtlijn Auteursrecht in de digitale eengemaakte markt (‘DSM-richtlijn’) terug moet naar de tekentafel, of liever nog de prullenbak in.}, keywords = {frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom, Journalistiek, media, pers, uitgeversrecht}, }

Bridging the gap: Private international law principles for intellectual property law external link

van Eechoud, M.
Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR), num: 4, pp: 716-723, 2017

Abstract

This past decade has seen a veritable surge of development of ‘soft law’ private international instruments for intellectual property. A global network has been formed made up of academics and practitioners who work on the intersection of these domains. This article examines the synthesizing work of the International Law Association’s Committee on intellectual property and private international law. Now that its draft Guidelines on jurisdiction, applicable law and enforcement are at an advanced stage, what can be said about consensus and controversy about dealing with transborder intellectual property disputes in the information age? What role can principles play in a world where multilateral rulemaking on intellectual property becomes ever deeply politicized and framed as an issue of trade? Arguably, private international law retains it facilitating role and will continue to attract the attention of intellectual property law specialists as a necessary integral part of regulating transborder information flows.

frontpage, intellectual property law, Intellectuele eigendom, private international law

Bibtex

Article{vanEechoud2017b, title = {Bridging the gap: Private international law principles for intellectual property law}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/NIPR_2016_4.pdf}, year = {0124}, date = {2017-01-24}, journal = {Nederlands Internationaal Privaatrecht (NIPR)}, number = {4}, abstract = {This past decade has seen a veritable surge of development of ‘soft law’ private international instruments for intellectual property. A global network has been formed made up of academics and practitioners who work on the intersection of these domains. This article examines the synthesizing work of the International Law Association’s Committee on intellectual property and private international law. Now that its draft Guidelines on jurisdiction, applicable law and enforcement are at an advanced stage, what can be said about consensus and controversy about dealing with transborder intellectual property disputes in the information age? What role can principles play in a world where multilateral rulemaking on intellectual property becomes ever deeply politicized and framed as an issue of trade? Arguably, private international law retains it facilitating role and will continue to attract the attention of intellectual property law specialists as a necessary integral part of regulating transborder information flows.}, keywords = {frontpage, intellectual property law, Intellectuele eigendom, private international law}, }

International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie external link

Poort, J.
2016

Abstract

Presentation "International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie" at International Conference on Private Copying, Hermitage Amsterdam 23 June 2016

Intellectuele eigendom, levies, private copy, private copying, thuiskopie, WIPO

Bibtex

Presentation{Poort2016, title = {International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie}, author = {Poort, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/20160623-International-Conference-on-Private-Copying-Joost-Poort-3.pdf}, year = {0623}, date = {2016-06-23}, abstract = {Presentation "International Survey on Private Copying WIPO – Thuiskopie" at International Conference on Private Copying, Hermitage Amsterdam 23 June 2016}, keywords = {Intellectuele eigendom, levies, private copy, private copying, thuiskopie, WIPO}, }

Flexible Copyright. Can EU Author’s Right Accommodate Fair Use? external link

Hugenholtz, P.
2016

Abstract

Almost everyone agrees that modern copyright law needs to be flexible in order to accommodate rapid technological change and evolving media uses. In the United States fair use is the flexible instrument of choice. Author’s right systems in Europe are generally deemed to be less flexible and less tolerant to open-ended limitations and exceptions. But are they really?
This chapter makes the case that (1) author’s rights systems can be made as flexible as copyright systems, and (2) that the existing EU legal framework does not preclude the development of flexible norms at the national level.

Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Flexible Copyright. Can EU Author’s Right Accommodate Fair Use?}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1821}, year = {0802}, date = {2016-08-02}, abstract = {Almost everyone agrees that modern copyright law needs to be flexible in order to accommodate rapid technological change and evolving media uses. In the United States fair use is the flexible instrument of choice. Author’s right systems in Europe are generally deemed to be less flexible and less tolerant to open-ended limitations and exceptions. But are they really? This chapter makes the case that (1) author’s rights systems can be made as flexible as copyright systems, and (2) that the existing EU legal framework does not preclude the development of flexible norms at the national level.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Concise European Copyright Law (second edition) external link

Hugenholtz, P.
0721

Abstract

The second edition of Concise European Copyright Law was published in Spring 2016. Concise European Copyright Law aims to offer the reader a rapid understanding of all the provisions of copyright law in force in Europe that have been enacted at the European and international levels. This volume takes the form of an article-by-article commentary on the relevant EU directives and international treaties in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights. Editors and authors are prominent specialists (academics and practitioners) in the field of international and European copyright law.

Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {Concise European Copyright Law (second edition)}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://lrus.wolterskluwer.com/store/products/concise-european-copyright-law-second-prod-9041128794/hardcover-item-1-9041128794}, year = {0721}, date = {2016-07-21}, abstract = {The second edition of Concise European Copyright Law was published in Spring 2016. Concise European Copyright Law aims to offer the reader a rapid understanding of all the provisions of copyright law in force in Europe that have been enacted at the European and international levels. This volume takes the form of an article-by-article commentary on the relevant EU directives and international treaties in the field of copyright and neighbouring rights. Editors and authors are prominent specialists (academics and practitioners) in the field of international and European copyright law.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Making the Digital Single Market Work for Copyright. Extending the Satellite & Cable Directive to content services on line external link

Hugenholtz, P.
2016

Abstract

Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of ‘Community exhaustion’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment.

Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Making the Digital Single Market Work for Copyright. Extending the Satellite & Cable Directive to content services on line}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1819}, year = {0715}, date = {2016-07-15}, abstract = {Despite 25 years of copyright harmonization the law of copyright in the EU has remained, essentially, national and territorial. For the world of tangible (physical) goods a similar problem of market fragmentation was solved decades ago by the ECJ establishing a rule of ‘Community exhaustion’ of the right of distribution. Ever since, goods incorporating intellectual property, such as records, books and trademarked clothing, may circulate freely across the EU after their initial authorized marketing in a Member State. Why not introduce a similar rule for the world of non-physical distribution? We do have an interesting precedent. Satellite broadcasting market suffered from similar copyright problems as the on line content services market today. In 1993 the Sat-Cab Directive solved such problems stating that satellite broadcasting is a relevant act for copyright purposes only in the country of origin of the signal. As a consequence, a license to broadcast audiovisual content by satellite would be needed only in the Member State from where the satellite signal was uplinked. This article examines the legal ramifications of the extension of the country of origin principle to the on line environment.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 21 april 2016 (Austro Mechana / Amazon Sàrl e.a.) external link

van Eechoud, M.
AMI, num: 3, pp: 78-79., 2016

Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 21 april 2016 (Austro Mechana / Amazon Sàrl e.a.)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1817}, year = {0715}, date = {2016-07-15}, journal = {AMI}, number = {3}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, Intellectuele eigendom}, }