On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU should consider collective management of P2P external link

Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, 0807, Series: MIPLC, ISBN: 978-3-8329-7638-5

Abstract

This book analyzes the E.U.’s approach to P2P, a digital age technology that highlights the tensions between the Internet and a territorial and fragmented copyright law. It aims at providing the necessary legal qualification and context to understand why the E.U., while following an economic and socially onerous path, has thus far failed to achieve its deterrence goals. It is argued that a solution to this conundrum must be based on the use of copyright law and policy as tools for market organization and innovation growth, with respect for rights holders and users (sometimes) opposing interests and the existing legal framework. The best answer to mass online P2P uses seems to be that of collective rights management, as it offers an organized licensing and remuneration system compatible with the interests of stakeholders. This is especially true in the E.U., home to a developed and sophisticated market of CMOs, subject to numerous ECJ and Commission decisions, as well as varying E.U. institutional approaches, all pointing towards a preference for multi-territorial and pan-European licensing models. In this context, this book tests the compatibility of several non-voluntary and voluntary approaches to P2P with international treaties, the <i>acquis </i>or simply strategic policy considerations.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU should consider collective management of P2P}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://www.nomos-shop.de/Quintais-On-Peers-Copyright-Why-EU-Should-Consider-Collective-Management-of-P2P/productview.aspx?product=19336&pac=weco}, year = {0807}, date = {2012-08-07}, abstract = {This book analyzes the E.U.’s approach to P2P, a digital age technology that highlights the tensions between the Internet and a territorial and fragmented copyright law. It aims at providing the necessary legal qualification and context to understand why the E.U., while following an economic and socially onerous path, has thus far failed to achieve its deterrence goals. It is argued that a solution to this conundrum must be based on the use of copyright law and policy as tools for market organization and innovation growth, with respect for rights holders and users (sometimes) opposing interests and the existing legal framework. The best answer to mass online P2P uses seems to be that of collective rights management, as it offers an organized licensing and remuneration system compatible with the interests of stakeholders. This is especially true in the E.U., home to a developed and sophisticated market of CMOs, subject to numerous ECJ and Commission decisions, as well as varying E.U. institutional approaches, all pointing towards a preference for multi-territorial and pan-European licensing models. In this context, this book tests the compatibility of several non-voluntary and voluntary approaches to P2P with international treaties, the <i>acquis </i>or simply strategic policy considerations.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Proposal for a Directive on collective rights management and (some) multi-territorial licensing external link

European Intellectual Property Review, num: 2, pp: 65-73, 2013

Abstract

This article provides a brief descriptive analysis of the recent Proposal from the European Commission for a Directive on collective rights management and multi-territorial licensing. After setting the necessary background, it examines the Proposal's main provisions, focusing on those establishing a governance and transparency framework for collecting societies and multi-territorial licensing for online uses of musical works.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Proposal for a Directive on collective rights management and (some) multi-territorial licensing}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2351186}, year = {0131}, date = {2013-01-31}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, number = {2}, abstract = {This article provides a brief descriptive analysis of the recent Proposal from the European Commission for a Directive on collective rights management and multi-territorial licensing. After setting the necessary background, it examines the Proposal\'s main provisions, focusing on those establishing a governance and transparency framework for collecting societies and multi-territorial licensing for online uses of musical works.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Dr Strangelaw, or how Portugal learned to stop worrying and love P2P external link

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, num: 3, pp: 193-196, 2013

Abstract

A recent decision by a Public Prosecutor in a criminal case in Portugal, based on an Opinion by the Prosecutor General's Office, considers download acts by peer-to-peer (P2P) users to be covered by the private use limitation, raises the possibility that acts of upload are also covered by it and considers IP addresses insufficient evidence upon which to prosecute users.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Dr Strangelaw, or how Portugal learned to stop worrying and love P2P}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/3/193.abstract}, year = {0222}, date = {2013-02-22}, journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice}, number = {3}, abstract = {A recent decision by a Public Prosecutor in a criminal case in Portugal, based on an Opinion by the Prosecutor General's Office, considers download acts by peer-to-peer (P2P) users to be covered by the private use limitation, raises the possibility that acts of upload are also covered by it and considers IP addresses insufficient evidence upon which to prosecute users.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Portuguese Supreme Court Sets New Boundaries for Compensation for Copyright Infringement external link

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, num: 11, pp: 687-688, 2009

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Portuguese Supreme Court Sets New Boundaries for Compensation for Copyright Infringement}, author = {Ramalho, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Ramalho_compensation%20c%20infringementDRAFT.pdf}, year = {0915}, date = {2009-09-15}, journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice}, number = {11}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

The European Union and ACTA – Or Making Omelettes without Eggs (Again) external link

IIC, num: 1, pp: 97-101, 2011

Abstract

The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has been cooking for some time now. Some ingredients to that dish are missing though - notably, a clear competence of the European Union. In fact, the Union's struggle for an expansion of its powers - especially in the area of harmonization of national laws with a basis on internal market considerations - has led some doctrine to express concerns whether the relevant provisions could give the EU carte blanche to harmonize in a wide variety of subjects. In the pre-Lisbon era, some authors have called this tendency "competence creep".

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {The European Union and ACTA – Or Making Omelettes without Eggs (Again)}, author = {Ramalho, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/161.pdf}, year = {0308}, date = {2011-03-08}, journal = {IIC}, number = {1}, abstract = {The Anti-Counterfeiting Trade Agreement (ACTA) has been cooking for some time now. Some ingredients to that dish are missing though - notably, a clear competence of the European Union. In fact, the Union's struggle for an expansion of its powers - especially in the area of harmonization of national laws with a basis on internal market considerations - has led some doctrine to express concerns whether the relevant provisions could give the EU carte blanche to harmonize in a wide variety of subjects. In the pre-Lisbon era, some authors have called this tendency "competence creep".}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Portugal – what will the future of private copying levies be? external link

GRUR International, num: 11, pp: 992, 2011

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Portugal – what will the future of private copying levies be?}, author = {Ramalho, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Ramalho_levies%20Portugal.pdf}, year = {1108}, date = {2011-11-08}, journal = {GRUR International}, number = {11}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Análise Económica da Proteção das Medidas Tecnológicas no Direito de Autor: Uma Visão Portuguesa external link

Direito da Comunicação Social e Liberdade de Expressão, num: 3, pp: 107-133, 2011

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Análise Económica da Proteção das Medidas Tecnológicas no Direito de Autor: Uma Visão Portuguesa}, author = {Ramalho, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/RevistadaComSocial.pdf}, year = {1214}, date = {2011-12-14}, journal = {Direito da Comunicação Social e Liberdade de Expressão}, number = {3}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }