‘Wresting (Racial) Equality from Tolerance of Hate Speech’ external link

Dublin University Law Journal, vol. 23, num: 21, pp: 21-54, 2004

Abstract

Dit artikel begint met een kort overzicht van theorieën over tolerantie. Daarna behandelt het de moeilijkheden die ontstaan bij de koppeling van vrijheid van meningsuiting met de strijd tegen racisme. Het artikel evalueert de relevante interationale juridische middelen en de algemene effectiviteit van zogeheten 'hate speech'-wetgeving. Verder bevat dit artikel ook een uitgebreide analyse van de 'hate speech' jurisprudentie van de UN Human Rights Committee en het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens. Tot slot wordt ook het begrip 'negationism' behandeld.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {‘Wresting (Racial) Equality from Tolerance of Hate Speech’}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/DULJhatespeech.pdf}, year = {1124}, date = {2004-11-24}, journal = {Dublin University Law Journal}, volume = {23}, number = {21}, pages = {21-54}, abstract = {Dit artikel begint met een kort overzicht van theorieën over tolerantie. Daarna behandelt het de moeilijkheden die ontstaan bij de koppeling van vrijheid van meningsuiting met de strijd tegen racisme. Het artikel evalueert de relevante interationale juridische middelen en de algemene effectiviteit van zogeheten 'hate speech'-wetgeving. Verder bevat dit artikel ook een uitgebreide analyse van de 'hate speech' jurisprudentie van de UN Human Rights Committee en het Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens. Tot slot wordt ook het begrip 'negationism' behandeld.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Protection of Human Dignity, Distribution of Racist Content (Hate Speech) external link

IRIS Special, pp: 43-46, 2003

Abstract

Artikel gebaseerd op een voordracht gegeven op het symposium 'Co-Regulation of the Media in Europe' (European Audiovisual Observatory / IViR / EMR, Firenze, Italië, 6-7 september 2002). In dit stuk wordt een overzicht gegeven van de relevante internationale juridische middelen met betrekking tot 'hate speech'-wetgeving en wordt de algemene effectiviteit van deze wetgeving geëvalueerd. Daarnaast komt ook de mogelijke zelf- en co-regulering op dit gebied aan bod.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Other{McGonagle2003, title = {Protection of Human Dignity, Distribution of Racist Content (Hate Speech)}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IRIS-Special-Co-regulation-of-the-Media-in-Europe.pdf}, year = {0930}, date = {2003-09-30}, journal = {IRIS Special}, abstract = {Artikel gebaseerd op een voordracht gegeven op het symposium \'Co-Regulation of the Media in Europe\' (European Audiovisual Observatory / IViR / EMR, Firenze, Italië, 6-7 september 2002). In dit stuk wordt een overzicht gegeven van de relevante internationale juridische middelen met betrekking tot \'hate speech\'-wetgeving en wordt de algemene effectiviteit van deze wetgeving geëvalueerd. Daarnaast komt ook de mogelijke zelf- en co-regulering op dit gebied aan bod.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

International and European legal standards for combating racist expression: selected current conundrums external link

pp: 39-50., 2007

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {International and European legal standards for combating racist expression: selected current conundrums}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Proceedings_ECRI_2007.pdf}, year = {0919}, date = {2007-09-19}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Free expression and respect for others external link

pp: 7-20 , 2009

Abstract

In deze hoofdstukken worden de grote lijnen van de normatieve standaarden van de Raad van Europa inzake twee relaties geschetst: (i) vrijheid van meningsuiting en informatievrijheid, media pluralisme en diversiteit en het beschermen van de menselijke waardigheid, en (ii) deelname in een democratische samenleving en toegang tot informatie en tot de media.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Free expression and respect for others}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680483533}, year = {0707}, date = {2009-07-07}, abstract = {In deze hoofdstukken worden de grote lijnen van de normatieve standaarden van de Raad van Europa inzake twee relaties geschetst: (i) vrijheid van meningsuiting en informatievrijheid, media pluralisme en diversiteit en het beschermen van de menselijke waardigheid, en (ii) deelname in een democratische samenleving en toegang tot informatie en tot de media.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Freedom of Expression and the Media: Standard-setting by the Council of Europe, (I) Committee of Ministers – IRIS Themes external link

Nikoltchev, S. & McGonagle, T.
European Audiovisual Observatory, 0224, pp: 398 pp.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {Freedom of Expression and the Media: Standard-setting by the Council of Europe, (I) Committee of Ministers – IRIS Themes}, author = {Nikoltchev, S. and McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/IRIS_Themes_I.pdf}, year = {0224}, date = {2011-02-24}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Minority Rights, Freedom of Expression and of the Media: Dynamics and Dilemmas external link

Intersentia , 0224, Series: (Netherlands) School of Human Rights Research Series, pp: 668

Abstract

This book offers a rigorous, theory-based, and uniquely comprehensive, analysis of European and international legal standards shaping minorities’ right to freedom of expression. The analysis pays particular attention to the instrumental role played by traditional and new forms of media in ensuring that the right to freedom of expression of persons belonging to minorities is effective in practice. The relevant international legal framework is set out in detail, including a careful examination of the relationship between generalist and minority-specific international human rights instruments. Due attention is paid to the historical circumstances in which key instruments were developed and the contemporary context in which they are now being interpreted. The analysis is also informed by an awareness of institutional and political dynamics. All of this forms the basis for the book’s central objective: to mount a critical evaluation of the existing international legal framework governing freedom of expression for minorities, while drawing on theoretical insights gained from human rights scholarship and communications science. The first major focus of the evaluation is the regulation and restriction of expression to protect minority rights, in which issues such as pluralism, tolerance and “hate speech” feature centrally. Its second major focus, the regulation and facilitation of expression to promote minority rights, explores cultural and linguistic rights and media access questions.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {Minority Rights, Freedom of Expression and of the Media: Dynamics and Dilemmas}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://intersentia.com/en/minority-rights-freedom-of-expression-and-of-the-media-dynamics-and-dilemmas.html}, year = {0224}, date = {2012-02-24}, abstract = {This book offers a rigorous, theory-based, and uniquely comprehensive, analysis of European and international legal standards shaping minorities’ right to freedom of expression. The analysis pays particular attention to the instrumental role played by traditional and new forms of media in ensuring that the right to freedom of expression of persons belonging to minorities is effective in practice. The relevant international legal framework is set out in detail, including a careful examination of the relationship between generalist and minority-specific international human rights instruments. Due attention is paid to the historical circumstances in which key instruments were developed and the contemporary context in which they are now being interpreted. The analysis is also informed by an awareness of institutional and political dynamics. All of this forms the basis for the book’s central objective: to mount a critical evaluation of the existing international legal framework governing freedom of expression for minorities, while drawing on theoretical insights gained from human rights scholarship and communications science. The first major focus of the evaluation is the regulation and restriction of expression to protect minority rights, in which issues such as pluralism, tolerance and “hate speech” feature centrally. Its second major focus, the regulation and facilitation of expression to promote minority rights, explores cultural and linguistic rights and media access questions.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

A survey and critical analysis of Council of Europe strategies for countering ‘hate speech’ external link

Abstract

The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories and values of different countries. Throughout, there is a strong comparative emphasis, with examples (and authors) drawn from around the world. All the authors explore whether or when different cultural and historical settings justify different substantive rules given that such cultural relativism can be used to justify content-based restrictions and so endanger freedom of expression. Essays address the following questions, among others: is hate speech in fact so dangerous or harmful to vulnerable minorities or communities as to justify a lower standard of constitutional protection? What harms and benefits accrue from laws that criminalize hate speech in particular contexts? Are there circumstances in which everyone would agree that hate speech should be criminally punished? What lessons can be learned from international case law?

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {A survey and critical analysis of Council of Europe strategies for countering ‘hate speech’}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/723.pdf}, year = {0601}, date = {2012-06-01}, abstract = {The contributors to this volume consider whether it is possible to establish carefully tailored hate speech policies that are cognizant of the varying traditions, histories and values of different countries. Throughout, there is a strong comparative emphasis, with examples (and authors) drawn from around the world. All the authors explore whether or when different cultural and historical settings justify different substantive rules given that such cultural relativism can be used to justify content-based restrictions and so endanger freedom of expression. Essays address the following questions, among others: is hate speech in fact so dangerous or harmful to vulnerable minorities or communities as to justify a lower standard of constitutional protection? What harms and benefits accrue from laws that criminalize hate speech in particular contexts? Are there circumstances in which everyone would agree that hate speech should be criminally punished? What lessons can be learned from international case law?}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Freedom of Expression Implications for the Governance of Search external link

IRIS Special, 2009

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Freedom of Expression Implications for the Governance of Search}, author = {van Hoboken, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/699.pdf}, year = {0330}, date = {2009-03-30}, journal = {IRIS Special}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

De onduidelijke verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en discriminatie: Een analyse van de groepsbelediging en het haatzaaien external link

Janssen, E. & Nieuwenhuis, A.
Mediaforum, num: 4, pp: 94-104, 2011

Abstract

De strafbaarstelling van groepsbelediging en haatzaaien vormt een beperking van de vrijheid van meningsuiting. Het is echter niet zeker waar precies de grens loopt tussen controversiële bijdragen aan het maatschappelijk debat en strafbare uitlatingen. Dat blijkt onder meer uit het verschil van opvatting tussen het OM en het Hof Amsterdam in casu Wilders. Dit artikel concentreert zich op de vraag waarom het zo moeilijk is de genoemde strafbepalingen eenduidig uit te leggen. Eén van de conclusies is dat de wetgever meer helderheid zou moeten scheppen.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {De onduidelijke verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en discriminatie: Een analyse van de groepsbelediging en het haatzaaien}, author = {Janssen, E. and Nieuwenhuis, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Mediaforum_2011_4.pdf}, year = {0419}, date = {2011-04-19}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {4}, abstract = {De strafbaarstelling van groepsbelediging en haatzaaien vormt een beperking van de vrijheid van meningsuiting. Het is echter niet zeker waar precies de grens loopt tussen controversiële bijdragen aan het maatschappelijk debat en strafbare uitlatingen. Dat blijkt onder meer uit het verschil van opvatting tussen het OM en het Hof Amsterdam in casu Wilders. Dit artikel concentreert zich op de vraag waarom het zo moeilijk is de genoemde strafbepalingen eenduidig uit te leggen. Eén van de conclusies is dat de wetgever meer helderheid zou moeten scheppen.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Limits to expression on religion in France ( ) external link

Janssen, E.
Journal of European Studies, num: 1, pp: 22-45, 2008

Abstract

This article examines the limits to expression on religion in France. It places the relevant provisions in French law and national case law concerning expression on religion within the context of the strict separation of the state and the church in France, known as la laïcité. Subsequently, it analyzes whether French case law complies with the relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Limits to expression on religion in France ( )}, author = {Janssen, E.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Limits_to_expression_on_religion_in_France.pdf}, year = {0409}, date = {2008-04-09}, journal = {Journal of European Studies}, number = {1}, abstract = {This article examines the limits to expression on religion in France. It places the relevant provisions in French law and national case law concerning expression on religion within the context of the strict separation of the state and the church in France, known as la laïcité. Subsequently, it analyzes whether French case law complies with the relevant case law of the European Court of Human Rights.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }