Laat de klok maar luiden. En andere korte stukken over vrijheid van meningsuiting external link

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {Laat de klok maar luiden. En andere korte stukken over vrijheid van meningsuiting}, author = {Schuijt, G.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1667.pdf}, year = {0622}, date = {2004-06-22}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: leaps and bounds or fits and starts? external link

Abstract

This chapter tells the story of how the rights to freedom of expression and information have been shaped by the United Nations’ (UN) institutional dynamics over the years. It gives an account of how the growth of the rights to freedom of expression and information has been both stimulated and stymied by different factors in the particular institutional context of the UN. It traces the broad contours of the two rights by connecting the largest conceptual, normative, historical and institutional dots.<br /> The chapter opens with a brief exploration of the contiguous nature of the rights to freedom of expression and information. This necessarily involves reflection on the instrumental role that the media and new communications technologies can play in the realization of both rights in practice. The remainder of the chapter has an overtly institutional focus. Its next three substantive sections correspond to three broad – roughly chronological, but occasionally overlapping - phases in the development of freedom of expression and information at the UN. Each period is denoted by its key features or aspirations: trail-blazing, consolidation and expansion, and the quest for coherence and consistency. Various thematic challenges have presented themselves during these periods, a number of which are woven into the chapter’s narrative. Finally, after offering some substantive conclusions, the chapter will explain the objectives and structure of the book as a whole.

Freedom of expression, frontpages, Grondrechten, UN, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Chapter{McGonagle2015, title = {The development of freedom of expression and information within the UN: leaps and bounds or fits and starts?}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, year = {0605}, date = {2015-06-05}, abstract = {This chapter tells the story of how the rights to freedom of expression and information have been shaped by the United Nations’ (UN) institutional dynamics over the years. It gives an account of how the growth of the rights to freedom of expression and information has been both stimulated and stymied by different factors in the particular institutional context of the UN. It traces the broad contours of the two rights by connecting the largest conceptual, normative, historical and institutional dots.<br /> The chapter opens with a brief exploration of the contiguous nature of the rights to freedom of expression and information. This necessarily involves reflection on the instrumental role that the media and new communications technologies can play in the realization of both rights in practice. The remainder of the chapter has an overtly institutional focus. Its next three substantive sections correspond to three broad – roughly chronological, but occasionally overlapping - phases in the development of freedom of expression and information at the UN. Each period is denoted by its key features or aspirations: trail-blazing, consolidation and expansion, and the quest for coherence and consistency. Various thematic challenges have presented themselves during these periods, a number of which are woven into the chapter’s narrative. Finally, after offering some substantive conclusions, the chapter will explain the objectives and structure of the book as a whole.}, keywords = {Freedom of expression, frontpages, Grondrechten, UN, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or real power? external link

1023, pp: 9-35.

Abstract

This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights has identified and developed a range of positive State obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression.  It first briefly examines the theoretical and normative bases for the positive obligations doctrine and then traces its hesitant development in the case-law of the Court. Next, it shows how the Court has slowly become more comfortable with the doctrine and more confident when applying it to cases involving freedom of expression, culminating in its <em>Dink v. Turkey</em> judgment. The driving argument of the chapter is that the positive obligations doctrine has enormous potential for strengthening the right to freedom of expression and that the Court must now tease out its implications in concrete cases in a very scrupulous way, if the doctrine’s full potential is to be realised.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Chapter{McGonagle2015, title = {Positive obligations concerning freedom of expression: mere potential or real power?}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=0900001680706afe}, year = {1023}, date = {2015-10-23}, abstract = {This chapter examines how the European Court of Human Rights has identified and developed a range of positive State obligations to secure the right to freedom of expression.  It first briefly examines the theoretical and normative bases for the positive obligations doctrine and then traces its hesitant development in the case-law of the Court. Next, it shows how the Court has slowly become more comfortable with the doctrine and more confident when applying it to cases involving freedom of expression, culminating in its <em>Dink v. Turkey</em> judgment. The driving argument of the chapter is that the positive obligations doctrine has enormous potential for strengthening the right to freedom of expression and that the Court must now tease out its implications in concrete cases in a very scrupulous way, if the doctrine’s full potential is to be realised.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights external link

European Audiovisual Observatory, 1023, Series: IRIS Themes, pp: 409

Abstract

This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French.
For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {Freedom of Expression, the Media and Journalists: Case-law of the European Court of Human Rights}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1644.pdf}, year = {1023}, date = {2015-10-23}, abstract = {This e-book provides valuable insights into the European Court of Human Rights’ case-law on freedom of expression and media and journalistic freedoms. The first edition of the e-book (2013) proved hugely successful, with 18,671 downloads in 2014 alone. The new updated edition summarises over 240 judgments or decisions by the Court and provides hyperlinks to the full text of each of the summarised judgments or decisions (via HUDOC, the Court's online case-law database). The e-book is also available in French. For an optimal navigational experience, one should download the e-book and read the technical tips on p. 3.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges external link

Abstract

This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced  by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Freedom of expression: new opportunities and challenges}, author = {McGonagle, T.}, url = {http://play.webvideocore.net/popplayer.php?it=55i5kw2syio0&is_link=1&w=720&h=405&pause=1&title=1502002+-+Tarlach+McGonagle+Interview+-+ENG&skin=3&repeat=&brandNW=1&start_volume=100&bg_gradient1=&bg_gradient2=&fullscreen=&fs_mode=0&skinAlpha=80&colorBase=%}, year = {1009}, date = {2015-10-09}, abstract = {This is one of seven videos about different aspects of the right to freedom of expression: hate speech, protection of sources, defamation, access to information, terrorism, Internet freedom and new opportunities and challenges for freedom of expression. The videos were produced  by the Council of Europe and they take the form of interviews with leading experts in the field, including three sitting judges of the European Court of Human Rights, a former Vice-President of the Court and the Council of Europe Human Rights Commissioner.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Freedom of Expression and ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain external link

European Data Protection Law Review, num: 2, pp: 113-125., 2015

Abstract

Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions.

Data protection law, european court of justice, Freedom of expression, google spain, Grondrechten, Privacy, right to be delisted, right to be forgotten, search engines, the netherlands, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Freedom of Expression and ‘Right to Be Forgotten’ Cases in the Netherlands after Google Spain}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2652171}, year = {0917}, date = {2015-09-17}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, abstract = {Since the Google Spain judgment of the Court of Justice of the European Union, Europeans have, under certain conditions, the right to have search results for their name delisted. This paper examines how the Google Spain judgment has been applied in the Netherlands. Since the Google Spain judgment, Dutch courts have decided on two cases regarding delisting requests. In both cases, the Dutch courts considered freedom of expression aspects of delisting more thoroughly than the Court of Justice. However, the effect of the Google Spain judgment on freedom of expression is difficult to assess, as search engine operators decide about most delisting requests without disclosing much about their decisions.}, keywords = {Data protection law, european court of justice, Freedom of expression, google spain, Grondrechten, Privacy, right to be delisted, right to be forgotten, search engines, the netherlands, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland) external link

European Human Rights Cases, num: 9, 2015

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 16 juni 2015 (Delfi AS / Estland)}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1622.pdf}, year = {0911}, date = {2015-09-11}, journal = {European Human Rights Cases}, number = {9}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting external link

NJCM-Bulletin, num: 1, pp: 3-19., 2015

Abstract

In deze bijdrage wordt het Google Spain-arrest van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie besproken, evenals de ontwikkelingen na het arrest. Centraal staat de vraag naar de gevolgen van het arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. De auteurs betogen dat het Hof onvoldoende aandacht schenkt aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting.

Grondrechten, Internet, Persoonsgegevens, Privacy, recht om vergeten te worden, Vrijheid van meningsuiting, zoekmachines

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {De implicaties van het Google Spain-arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. and Kulk, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1566.pdf}, year = {0604}, date = {2015-06-04}, journal = {NJCM-Bulletin}, number = {1}, abstract = {In deze bijdrage wordt het Google Spain-arrest van het Hof van Justitie van de Europese Unie besproken, evenals de ontwikkelingen na het arrest. Centraal staat de vraag naar de gevolgen van het arrest voor de vrijheid van meningsuiting. De auteurs betogen dat het Hof onvoldoende aandacht schenkt aan de vrijheid van meningsuiting.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Internet, Persoonsgegevens, Privacy, recht om vergeten te worden, Vrijheid van meningsuiting, zoekmachines}, }