Publicaties

Top Keywords

Cultural Heritage Online? Settle it in the Country of Origin of the Work external link

Guibault, L.
JIPITEC, num: 3, pp: 173-191., 2016

Abstract

This article examines the conditions under which a system of extended collective licensing (ECL) for the use of works contained in the collections of cultural heritage institutions (CHIs) participating in Europeana could function within a cross-border basis. ECL is understood as a form of collective rights management whereby the application of freely negotiated copyright licensing agreements between a user and a collective management organisation (“CMO”), is extended by law to non-members of the organisation. ECL regimes have already been put in place in a few Member States and so far, all have the ability to apply only on a national basis. This article proposes a mechanism that would allow works licensed under an ECL system in one territory of the European Union to be made available in all the territories of the Union. The proposal rests on the statutory recognition of the “country of origin” principle, as necessary and sufficient territory for the negotiation and application of an ECL solution for the rights clearance of works contained in the collection of a cultural heritage institution, including orphan works.

Auteursrecht, Copyright, cross-border access, cultural heritage, extended collective licensing, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Cultural Heritage Online? Settle it in the Country of Origin of the Work}, author = {Guibault, L.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1722.pdf}, year = {2016}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, abstract = {This article examines the conditions under which a system of extended collective licensing (ECL) for the use of works contained in the collections of cultural heritage institutions (CHIs) participating in Europeana could function within a cross-border basis. ECL is understood as a form of collective rights management whereby the application of freely negotiated copyright licensing agreements between a user and a collective management organisation (“CMO”), is extended by law to non-members of the organisation. ECL regimes have already been put in place in a few Member States and so far, all have the ability to apply only on a national basis. This article proposes a mechanism that would allow works licensed under an ECL system in one territory of the European Union to be made available in all the territories of the Union. The proposal rests on the statutory recognition of the “country of origin” principle, as necessary and sufficient territory for the negotiation and application of an ECL solution for the rights clearance of works contained in the collection of a cultural heritage institution, including orphan works.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Copyright, cross-border access, cultural heritage, extended collective licensing, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Scoping Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services and Values external link

van Hoboken, J. & Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.
JIPITEC, num: 3, pp: 198-210., 2016

Abstract

We use electronic communication networks for more than simply traditional telecommunications: we access the news, buy goods online, file our taxes, contribute to public debate, and more. As a result, a wider array of privacy interests is implicated for users of electronic communications networks and services. . This development calls into question the scope of electronic communications privacy rules. This paper analyses the scope of these rules, taking into account the rationale and the historic background of the European electronic communications privacy framework. We develop a framework for analysing the scope of electronic communications privacy rules using three approaches: (i) a service-centric approach, (ii) a data-centric approach, and (iii) a value-centric approach. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The current e-Privacy Directive contains a complex blend of the three approaches, which does not seem to be based on a thorough analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. The upcoming review of the directive announced by the European Commission provides an opportunity to improve the scoping of the rules.

data, e-Privacy Directive, electronic communication, Privacy, services, values

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Scoping Electronic Communication Privacy Rules: Data, Services and Values}, author = {van Hoboken, J. and Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1721.pdf}, year = {0119}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, abstract = {We use electronic communication networks for more than simply traditional telecommunications: we access the news, buy goods online, file our taxes, contribute to public debate, and more. As a result, a wider array of privacy interests is implicated for users of electronic communications networks and services. . This development calls into question the scope of electronic communications privacy rules. This paper analyses the scope of these rules, taking into account the rationale and the historic background of the European electronic communications privacy framework. We develop a framework for analysing the scope of electronic communications privacy rules using three approaches: (i) a service-centric approach, (ii) a data-centric approach, and (iii) a value-centric approach. We discuss the strengths and weaknesses of each approach. The current e-Privacy Directive contains a complex blend of the three approaches, which does not seem to be based on a thorough analysis of their strengths and weaknesses. The upcoming review of the directive announced by the European Commission provides an opportunity to improve the scoping of the rules.}, keywords = {data, e-Privacy Directive, electronic communication, Privacy, services, values}, }

Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Violations in Europe external link

van der Sloot, B.
JIPITEC, num: 3, pp: 211-228., 2016

Abstract

In Europe, roughly three regimes apply to the liability of Internet intermediaries for privacy violations conducted by users through their network. These are: the e-Commerce Directive, which, under certain conditions, excludes them from liability; the Data Protection Directive, which imposes a number of duties and responsibilities on providers processing personal data; and the freedom of expression, contained inter alia in the ECHR, which, under certain conditions, grants Internet providers several privileges and freedoms. Each doctrine has its own field of application, but they also have partial overlap. In practice, this creates legal inequality and uncertainty, especially with regard to providers that host online platforms and process User Generated Content.

Data protection, ECHR, Freedom of expression, Grondrechten, intermediaries, liability, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Welcome to the Jungle: the Liability of Internet Intermediaries for Privacy Violations in Europe}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1720.pdf}, year = {0119}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {3}, abstract = {In Europe, roughly three regimes apply to the liability of Internet intermediaries for privacy violations conducted by users through their network. These are: the e-Commerce Directive, which, under certain conditions, excludes them from liability; the Data Protection Directive, which imposes a number of duties and responsibilities on providers processing personal data; and the freedom of expression, contained inter alia in the ECHR, which, under certain conditions, grants Internet providers several privileges and freedoms. Each doctrine has its own field of application, but they also have partial overlap. In practice, this creates legal inequality and uncertainty, especially with regard to providers that host online platforms and process User Generated Content.}, keywords = {Data protection, ECHR, Freedom of expression, Grondrechten, intermediaries, liability, Privacy}, }

On private persons monitoring the public space external link

Hijmans, H.
European Data Protection Law Review, num: 2, pp: 1-4., 2016

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {On private persons monitoring the public space}, author = {Hijmans, H.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1719.pdf}, year = {0119}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, number = {2}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Right to have links removed: Evidence of effective data protection external link

Hijmans, H.
Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, num: 3, pp: 555-563., 2016

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Right to have links removed: Evidence of effective data protection}, author = {Hijmans, H.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1718.pdf}, year = {0119}, date = {2016-01-19}, journal = {Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law}, number = {3}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

De geschonden majesteit external link

Nieuwenhuis, A.
Ars Aequi, num: 1, pp: 21-24., 2016

Abstract

Sinds 1830 is in Nederland de majesteitsschennis strafbaar; met enige regelmaat vinden er ook vervolgingen plaats. Hieronder wordt de vraag gesteld of een dergelijk delict in een moderne democratie wel bestaansrecht heeft. De vraag wordt beantwoord door aandacht te besteden aan de rechtsgoederen die een verbod van belediging kan beschermen, aan de verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en democratie, aan de onschendbaarheid van de koning, en aan de ontwikkeling van het positieve recht.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {De geschonden majesteit}, author = {Nieuwenhuis, A.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1716.pdf}, year = {0115}, date = {2016-01-15}, journal = {Ars Aequi}, number = {1}, abstract = {Sinds 1830 is in Nederland de majesteitsschennis strafbaar; met enige regelmaat vinden er ook vervolgingen plaats. Hieronder wordt de vraag gesteld of een dergelijk delict in een moderne democratie wel bestaansrecht heeft. De vraag wordt beantwoord door aandacht te besteden aan de rechtsgoederen die een verbod van belediging kan beschermen, aan de verhouding tussen vrijheid van meningsuiting en democratie, aan de onschendbaarheid van de koning, en aan de ontwikkeling van het positieve recht.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Authorship, Aesthetics and the Artworld: Reforming Copyright’s Joint Authorship Doctrine external link

L. Biron & E. Cooper
Law and Philosophy, num: 1, pp: 55-85., 2016

Abstract

This article considers the extent to which insights from the philosophy of art can assist copyright law in identifying the author or authors of works to which many have contributed. In doing so, it looks to institutional theories of art, which go beyond a simple bifurcation of ‘author’ and ‘work’, and focus instead on broader determinants of an art work’s production, such as the ‘artworld’. It puts forward a framework focusing on three components of authorship supported by these theories: role, authority and intention. The paper then draws attention to some important challenges that this framework raises for copyright law’s joint authorship doctrine in the UK and USA, and suggests some ways in which copyright law might be reformed, so as to allow copyright to retain its own benchmarks while also bringing conceptions of authorship in law and art closer together.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{Biron2016, title = {Authorship, Aesthetics and the Artworld: Reforming Copyright’s Joint Authorship Doctrine}, author = {L. Biron and E. Cooper}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1715.pdf}, year = {0115}, date = {2016-01-15}, journal = {Law and Philosophy}, number = {1}, abstract = {This article considers the extent to which insights from the philosophy of art can assist copyright law in identifying the author or authors of works to which many have contributed. In doing so, it looks to institutional theories of art, which go beyond a simple bifurcation of ‘author’ and ‘work’, and focus instead on broader determinants of an art work’s production, such as the ‘artworld’. It puts forward a framework focusing on three components of authorship supported by these theories: role, authority and intention. The paper then draws attention to some important challenges that this framework raises for copyright law’s joint authorship doctrine in the UK and USA, and suggests some ways in which copyright law might be reformed, so as to allow copyright to retain its own benchmarks while also bringing conceptions of authorship in law and art closer together.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Forfatterskap i TV-drama: Showrunnermodellen, one vision – og Kampen for tilværelsen (Authorship in TV Drama: The Showrunner Model, One Vision – and the Struggle for Survival) external link

0115

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {Forfatterskap i TV-drama: Showrunnermodellen, one vision – og Kampen for tilværelsen (Authorship in TV Drama: The Showrunner Model, One Vision – and the Struggle for Survival)}, author = {}, url = {https://www.idunn.no/forfatterskap-i-tv-drama}, year = {0115}, date = {2016-01-15}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

De nieuwe Europese privacywetgeving: stand van zaken bijna twee jaar na Commissievoorstel external link

Hijmans, H.
Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht, num: 10, pp: 346-351., 2013

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {De nieuwe Europese privacywetgeving: stand van zaken bijna twee jaar na Commissievoorstel}, author = {Hijmans, H.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1713.pdf}, year = {1010}, date = {2013-10-10}, journal = {Nederlands tijdschrift voor Europees recht}, number = {10}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }