Publicaties

Top Keywords

Auteursrecht en artificiële creatie external link

Hugenholtz, P. & Quintais, J.
Auteursrecht, num: 2, pp: 47-52, 2021

Abstract

In dit artikel wordt de vraag gesteld of voortbrengselen die met behulp van AI-systemen tot stand zijn gebracht auteursrechtelijk beschermd kunnen zijn. Centraal in deze analyse staat niet de machine, maar de rol van de mens in het door het AI-systeem ondersteunde creatieve proces. Is deze rol voldoende om het resultaat als auteursrechtelijke beschermd werk te kwalificeren? En wie heeft in dat geval te gelden als maker(s)? Deze vragen worden aan de hand van het Unierecht en de jurisprudentie van het HvJ EU beantwoord. Dit artikel is gebaseerd op een studie die in opdracht van de Europese Commissie is verricht en aan de basis ligt van het door de Commissie in het Actieplan IE geformuleerde beleidsstandpunt over AI-creaties.

Auteursrecht, creaties, frontpage, kunstmatige intelligentie

Bibtex

Article{Hugenholtz2021b, title = {Auteursrecht en artificiële creatie}, author = {Hugenholtz, P. and Quintais, J.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Auteursrecht-2021-2.pdf}, year = {0617}, date = {2021-06-17}, journal = {Auteursrecht}, number = {2}, abstract = {In dit artikel wordt de vraag gesteld of voortbrengselen die met behulp van AI-systemen tot stand zijn gebracht auteursrechtelijk beschermd kunnen zijn. Centraal in deze analyse staat niet de machine, maar de rol van de mens in het door het AI-systeem ondersteunde creatieve proces. Is deze rol voldoende om het resultaat als auteursrechtelijke beschermd werk te kwalificeren? En wie heeft in dat geval te gelden als maker(s)? Deze vragen worden aan de hand van het Unierecht en de jurisprudentie van het HvJ EU beantwoord. Dit artikel is gebaseerd op een studie die in opdracht van de Europese Commissie is verricht en aan de basis ligt van het door de Commissie in het Actieplan IE geformuleerde beleidsstandpunt over AI-creaties.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, creaties, frontpage, kunstmatige intelligentie}, }

Commission’s Guidance on Art. 17 CDSM Directive: the authorisation dimension external link

Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2021

Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Auteursrecht, frontpage

Bibtex

Article{Quintais2021, title = {Commission’s Guidance on Art. 17 CDSM Directive: the authorisation dimension}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/06/10/commissions-guidance-on-art-17-cdsm-directive-the-authorisation-dimension/}, year = {0610}, date = {2021-06-10}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Auteursrecht, frontpage}, }

Platform ad archives in Article 30 DSA external link

Leerssen, P.
DSA Observatory blog, 2021

Digital services act, frontpage, Platforms

Bibtex

Article{Leerssen2021, title = {Platform ad archives in Article 30 DSA}, author = {Leerssen, P.}, url = {https://dsa-observatory.eu/2021/05/25/platform-ad-archives-in-article-30-dsa/}, year = {0525}, date = {2021-05-25}, journal = {DSA Observatory blog}, keywords = {Digital services act, frontpage, Platforms}, }

Commission’s Guidance on Art. 17 CDSM Directive: the authorisation dimension external link

Quintais, J.
2021

Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Article 17, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Copyright, frontpage

Bibtex

Online publication{Quintais2021-Guidance, title = {Commission’s Guidance on Art. 17 CDSM Directive: the authorisation dimension}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/06/10/commissions-guidance-on-art-17-cdsm-directive-the-authorisation-dimension/}, year = {0610}, date = {2021-06-10}, keywords = {Art. 17 CDSM Directive, Article 17, Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union, Copyright, frontpage}, }

Regulation of news recommenders in the Digital Services Act: empowering David against the Very Large Online Goliath external link

Helberger, N., Drunen, M. van, Vrijenhoek, S. & Möller, J.
Internet Policy Review, 2021

Digital services act, frontpage, Mediarecht, news recommenders, Regulering

Bibtex

Article{Helberger2021b, title = {Regulation of news recommenders in the Digital Services Act: empowering David against the Very Large Online Goliath}, author = {Helberger, N. and Drunen, M. van and Vrijenhoek, S. and Möller, J.}, url = {https://policyreview.info/articles/news/regulation-news-recommenders-digital-services-act-empowering-david-against-very-large}, year = {0226}, date = {2021-02-26}, journal = {Internet Policy Review}, keywords = {Digital services act, frontpage, Mediarecht, news recommenders, Regulering}, }

News media’s dependency on big tech: should we be worried? external link

Seipp, T.
Internet Policy Review, 2021

frontpage, Mediarecht

Bibtex

Article{Seipp2021, title = {News media’s dependency on big tech: should we be worried?}, author = {Seipp, T.}, url = {https://policyreview.info/articles/news/news-medias-dependency-big-tech-should-we-be-worried/1562}, year = {0610}, date = {2021-06-10}, journal = {Internet Policy Review}, keywords = {frontpage, Mediarecht}, }

Smartphone platforms as privacy regulators external link

van Hoboken, J. & Fahy, R.
Computer Law & Security Review, vol. 41, 2021

Abstract

A series of recent developments highlight the increasingly important role of online platforms in impacting data privacy in today's digital economy. Revelations and parliamentary hearings about privacy violations in Facebook's app and service partner ecosystem, EU Court of Justice judgments on joint responsibility of platforms and platform users, and the rise of smartphone app ecosystems where app behaviour is governed by app distribution platforms and operating systems, all show that platform policies can make or break the enjoyment of privacy by users. In this article, we examine these developments and explore the question of what can and should be the role of platforms in protecting data privacy of their users.

frontpage, Privacy, Regulering, smartphones

Bibtex

Article{vanHoboken2021b, title = {Smartphone platforms as privacy regulators}, author = {van Hoboken, J. and Fahy, R.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Smartphone-platforms-as-privacy-regulators.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2021.105557}, year = {0610}, date = {2021-06-10}, journal = {Computer Law & Security Review}, volume = {41}, pages = {}, abstract = {A series of recent developments highlight the increasingly important role of online platforms in impacting data privacy in today\'s digital economy. Revelations and parliamentary hearings about privacy violations in Facebook\'s app and service partner ecosystem, EU Court of Justice judgments on joint responsibility of platforms and platform users, and the rise of smartphone app ecosystems where app behaviour is governed by app distribution platforms and operating systems, all show that platform policies can make or break the enjoyment of privacy by users. In this article, we examine these developments and explore the question of what can and should be the role of platforms in protecting data privacy of their users.}, keywords = {frontpage, Privacy, Regulering, smartphones}, }

Book review: European Libraries and the Internet: Copyright and Extended Collective Licences, by Ran Tryggvadottir. external link

Quintais, J.
Common Market Law Review, vol. 58, num: 3, pp: 961 – 964, 2021

Collective licensing, collective management, extended collective licensing, frontpage

Bibtex

Article{Quintais2021-COLA, title = {Book review: European Libraries and the Internet: Copyright and Extended Collective Licences, by Ran Tryggvadottir.}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {https://kluwerlawonline.com/JournalArticle/Common+Market+Law+Review/58.3/COLA2021061}, year = {0601}, date = {2021-06-01}, journal = {Common Market Law Review}, volume = {58}, number = {3}, pages = {961 – 964}, keywords = {Collective licensing, collective management, extended collective licensing, frontpage}, }

European Commission back-tracks on user rights in Article 17 Guidance external link

Reda, J. & Keller, P.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2021

Auteursrecht, frontpage

Bibtex

Article{Reda2021, title = {European Commission back-tracks on user rights in Article 17 Guidance}, author = {Reda, J. and Keller, P.}, url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2021/06/04/european-commission-back-tracks-on-user-rights-in-article-17-guidance/}, year = {0604}, date = {2021-06-04}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage}, }

Crosshatching Privacy: Financial Intermediaries’ Data Practices Between Law Enforcement and Data Economy external link

Ferrari, V.
European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 6, num: 4, pp: 522-535, 2020

Abstract

Financial data are key to various law enforcement processes, including criminal investigations, anti-money laundering strategies and the implementation of national fiscal policies. However, financial data also qualify as personal data. While law enforcement objectives can derogate certain privacy-related legal safeguards, private financial firms should, in principle, comply with the privacy standards upheld by GDPR. Highlighting the most critical trends of the current financial industry (i.e. commercial exploitation of data; international dimension of financial informational networks; use of automated processing and decision-making tools), the present paper analyses how privacy and law enforcement priorities interplay in determining the governance of financial data. We conclude by recognizing that privacy loopholes exist in the current financial industry’s data practices, and that - as payments tend to be increasingly performed in digital manners, exponentially increasing the availability of financial data - privacy-enhancing payment methods should be encouraged and legitimised.

financiele dienstverlening, handhaving, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{Ferrari2020b, title = {Crosshatching Privacy: Financial Intermediaries’ Data Practices Between Law Enforcement and Data Economy}, author = {Ferrari, V.}, url = {https://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2020/4/8 https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/edpl_2020_04.pdf}, doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2020/4/8}, year = {1222}, date = {2020-12-22}, journal = {European Data Protection Law Review}, volume = {6}, number = {4}, pages = {522-535}, abstract = {Financial data are key to various law enforcement processes, including criminal investigations, anti-money laundering strategies and the implementation of national fiscal policies. However, financial data also qualify as personal data. While law enforcement objectives can derogate certain privacy-related legal safeguards, private financial firms should, in principle, comply with the privacy standards upheld by GDPR. Highlighting the most critical trends of the current financial industry (i.e. commercial exploitation of data; international dimension of financial informational networks; use of automated processing and decision-making tools), the present paper analyses how privacy and law enforcement priorities interplay in determining the governance of financial data. We conclude by recognizing that privacy loopholes exist in the current financial industry’s data practices, and that - as payments tend to be increasingly performed in digital manners, exponentially increasing the availability of financial data - privacy-enhancing payment methods should be encouraged and legitimised.}, keywords = {financiele dienstverlening, handhaving, Privacy}, }