frontpage, Kronieken, Telecommunicatierecht
Article{vanEijk2018l,
title = {Kroniek Telecommunicatierecht},
author = {van Eijk, N.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AA_149.pdf},
year = {1207},
date = {2018-12-07},
journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi},
volume = {2018},
number = {146},
pages = {8749-8751},
keywords = {frontpage, Kronieken, Telecommunicatierecht},
} Auteursrecht, frontpage, originaliteit
Article{Coche2018h,
title = {‘Hommage au fromage’ or how the CJEU said farewell to Heks’nkaas by excluding copyright protection for works of taste},
author = {Coche, E.},
url = {http://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2018/12/05/hommage-au-fromage-or-how-the-cjeu-said-farewell-to-heksnkaas-by-excluding-copyright-protection-for-works-of-taste/},
year = {1205},
date = {2018-12-05},
journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, frontpage, originaliteit},
} Auteursrecht, exploitatierechten
Chapter{Rognstad2018,
title = {The Right to Reasonable Exploitation Concretized: An Incentive Based Approach},
author = {Rognstad, O.A. and Poort, J.},
year = {0503},
date = {2018-05-03},
volume = {2018},
pages = {},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, exploitatierechten},
} Auteursrecht, value gaps
Chapter{Quintais2018f,
title = {A Brief History of Value Gaps: Pre-Internet Copyright Protection and Exploitation Models},
author = {Quintais, J. and Poort, J.},
year = {0503},
date = {2018-05-03},
volume = {2018},
pages = {11-58},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, value gaps},
} Technologie en recht
Report{Til2016b,
title = {Digitale Platforms: een analytisch kader voor het identificeren en evalueren van beleidsopties},
author = {Til, H. van and Nooren, P. and Stokking, H. and Gelevert, H. and van Eijk, N. and Fahy, R.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/digitale-platforms_tno-1.pdf},
year = {0107},
date = {2016-01-07},
abstract = {Nederlandse samenvatting van rapport "Digital platforms: an analytical framework for identifying and evaluating policy options".},
keywords = {Technologie en recht},
} access to information, algoritmes, Artificial intelligence, frontpage, news, persona, Personalisation, right to receive information, user agency
Article{Harambam2018b,
title = {Democratizing algorithmic news recommenders: how to materialize voice in a technologically saturated media ecosystem},
author = {Harambam, J. and Helberger, N. and van Hoboken, J.},
url = {http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/roypta/376/2133/20180088.full.pdf
},
doi = {https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsta.2018.0088},
year = {1123},
date = {2018-11-23},
journal = {Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A},
volume = {376},
number = {2135},
pages = {1-21},
abstract = {The deployment of various forms of AI, most notably of machine learning algorithms, radically transforms many domains of social life. In this paper we focus on the news industry, where different algorithms are used to customize news offerings to increasingly specific audience preferences. While this personalization of news enables media organizations to be more receptive to their audience, it can be questioned whether current deployments of algorithmic news recommenders (ANR) live up to their emancipatory promise. Like in various other domains, people have little knowledge of what personal data is used and how such algorithmic curation comes about, let alone that they have any concrete ways to influence these data-driven processes. Instead of going down the intricate avenue of trying to make ANR more transparent, we explore in this article ways to give people more influence over the information news recommendation algorithms provide by thinking about and enabling possibilities to express voice. After differentiating four ideal typical modalities of expressing voice (alternation, awareness, adjustment and obfuscation) which are illustrated with currently existing empirical examples, we present and argue for algorithmic recommender personae as a way for people to take more control over the algorithms that curate people\'s news provision.},
keywords = {access to information, algoritmes, Artificial intelligence, frontpage, news, persona, Personalisation, right to receive information, user agency},
} algoritmes, conspiracy theories, Fake news, fakenews, Freedom of expression, frontpage
Article{Harambam2017,
title = {De/politisering van de Waarheid: Complottheorieën, alternatieve feiten en nepnieuws in het tijdperk van de postwaarheid},
author = {Harambam, J.},
url = {https://www.ingentaconnect.com/contentone/aup/soc/2017/00000013/00000001/art00007#},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5117/SOC2017.1.HARA},
year = {1123},
date = {2018-11-23},
journal = {Sociologie},
volume = {13},
number = {1},
pages = {73-92},
abstract = {The Truth dominates many public discussions today. Conventional truths from established epistemic authorities about all sorts of issues, from climate change to terrorist attacks, are increasingly challenged by ordinary citizens and presidents alike. Many have therefore proclaimed that we have entered a post-truth era: a world in which objective facts are no longer relevant. Media and politics speak in alarmist discourse about how fake news, conspiracy theories and alternative facts threaten democratic societies by destabilizing the Truth ‐ a clear sign of a moral panic. In this essay, I firstly explore what sociological changes have led to (so much commotion about) the alleged demise of the Truth. In contrast to the idea that we have moved beyond it, I argue that we are amidst public battles about the Truth: at stake is who gets to decide over that and why. I then discuss and criticize the dominant counter reaction (re-establishing the idea of one objective and irrefutable truth), which I see as an unsuccessful de-politisation strategy. Basing myself on research and experiments with epistemic democracy in the field of science studies, I end with a more effective and democratic alternative of how to deal with knowledge in the complex information landscape of today.},
keywords = {algoritmes, conspiracy theories, Fake news, fakenews, Freedom of expression, frontpage},
} automated decision making, Big data, Data protection, frontpage, General Data Protection Regulation, Privacy, profiling
Chapter{Oostveen2018,
title = {The Golden Age of Personal Data: How to Regulate an Enabling Fundamental Right?},
author = {Oostveen, M. and Irion, K.},
url = {https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-662-57646-5_2},
year = {1120},
date = {2018-11-20},
abstract = {New technologies, purposes and applications to process individuals’ personal data are being developed on a massive scale. But we have not only entered the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of its exploitation: ours is also the ‘golden age of personal data’ in terms of regulation of its use. Understood as an enabling right, the architecture of EU data protection law is capable of protecting against many of the negative short- and long-term effects of contemporary data processing. Against the backdrop of big data applications, we evaluate how the implementation of privacy and data protection rules protect against the short- and long-term effects of contemporary data processing. We conclude that from the perspective of protecting individual fundamental rights and freedoms, it would be worthwhile to explore alternative (legal) approaches instead of relying on EU data protection law alone to cope with contemporary data processing.},
keywords = {automated decision making, Big data, Data protection, frontpage, General Data Protection Regulation, Privacy, profiling},
}