Herberekening reserveprijzen download

Kerste, M., Kuczynski, A., Poort, J. & Tieben, B.
2023

Abstract

SEO-notitie: 2023-19

radio, vergunningen

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Herberekening reserveprijzen}, author = {Kerste, M. and Kuczynski, A. and Poort, J. and Tieben, B.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/nl/publications/herberekening-reserveprijzen/notitie-herberekening-reserveprijzen/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-02-17}, abstract = {SEO-notitie: 2023-19}, keywords = {radio, vergunningen}, }

Reciprociteit bij bescherming vormgeving na RAAP: Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 31 maart 2023 (Kwantum / Vitra) download

Berichten Industriële Eigendom, iss. : 4, num: 10, pp: 221-223, 2023

Intellectual property, reciprociteit, vormgeving

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Reciprociteit bij bescherming vormgeving na RAAP: Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 31 maart 2023 (Kwantum / Vitra)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/nl/publications/reciprociteit-bij-bescherming-vormgeving-na-raap-annotatie-bij-hoge-raad-31-maart-2023-kwantum-vitra/annotatie_bie_2023_10/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-10-31}, journal = {Berichten Industriële Eigendom}, issue = {4}, number = {10}, keywords = {Intellectual property, reciprociteit, vormgeving}, }

Inaugural lecture: The Lure of Open Data download

Abstract

English translation of the inaugural lecture ‘De lokroep van open data’ given at the University of Amsterdam, 23 May 2014.

Inaugural lecture, Open Data

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Inaugural lecture: The Lure of Open Data}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/nl/publications/inaugural-lecture-the-lure-of-open-data/lure-of-open-data/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-10-31}, abstract = {English translation of the inaugural lecture ‘De lokroep van open data’ given at the University of Amsterdam, 23 May 2014.}, keywords = {Inaugural lecture, Open Data}, }

Facilitating #dialogue or #buildingsupport? An Exploration of the International Criminal Court’s Use of 280 Characters

Journal of International Criminal Justice, vol. 20, iss. : 1, pp: 55-80, 2022

Abstract

This systematic study of the International Criminal Court (ICC)’s stakeholder communication on Twitter brings attention to the largely unexamined phenomenon of the ICC’s active presence on social media. It answers the following research question: ‘To what extent has the ICC used Twitter to facilitate dialogue and exchange with its stakeholders as opposed to one-way information provision?’ Literary research and the descriptive analysis of 1,712 tweets and retweets published by @IntlCrimCourt between November 2017 and June 2019 reveal that the ICC primarily used Twitter to provide information and build support among its most powerful stakeholders. Notwithstanding its stated commitment to two-way stakeholder communication, the ICC made little to no effort to solicit feedback or generate dialogue on Twitter. These findings reveal the opportunities and limitations of Twitter as a mechanism to communicate with stakeholders and highlight the difficult position the ICC finds itself in as an international judicial institution dependent on state support.

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Facilitating #dialogue or #buildingsupport? An Exploration of the International Criminal Court’s Use of 280 Characters}, author = {Banks, I.}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqac005}, year = {2022}, date = {2022-03-03}, journal = {Journal of International Criminal Justice}, volume = {20}, issue = {1}, pages = {55-80}, abstract = {This systematic study of the International Criminal Court (ICC)’s stakeholder communication on Twitter brings attention to the largely unexamined phenomenon of the ICC’s active presence on social media. It answers the following research question: ‘To what extent has the ICC used Twitter to facilitate dialogue and exchange with its stakeholders as opposed to one-way information provision?’ Literary research and the descriptive analysis of 1,712 tweets and retweets published by @IntlCrimCourt between November 2017 and June 2019 reveal that the ICC primarily used Twitter to provide information and build support among its most powerful stakeholders. Notwithstanding its stated commitment to two-way stakeholder communication, the ICC made little to no effort to solicit feedback or generate dialogue on Twitter. These findings reveal the opportunities and limitations of Twitter as a mechanism to communicate with stakeholders and highlight the difficult position the ICC finds itself in as an international judicial institution dependent on state support.}, }

The construction of self-sovereign identity: Extending the interpretive flexibility of technology towards institutions external link

Weigl, L., Barbereau, T. & Fridgen, G.
Government Information Quarterly, vol. 40, iss. : 4, 2023

Abstract

Ever-growing concerns over ‘Big Brother’ continue driving individuals towards user-centric identity management systems. Nascent innovations are framed as offering Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). Because of the association with value-laden ideals and technical components like blockchain, SSI is caught up with both hype and idiosyncrasy. Competing interpretations of SSI damage the public discourse and risk misrepresenting affordances these systems might offer. Based on a qualitative inductive interview study and document analysis, this article extrapolates a constructivist theoretical frame – the Extended Model of Interpretive Flexibility – which combines insights from the Social Construction of Technology and the Structurational Model of Technology. The Extended Model of Interpretive Flexibility highlights malleability in the technical implementations and social representations, which in turn is affected by and influences institutional properties around SSI. This research further offers implications for practice around the implementation of SSI, in particular regarding policy, management, and design. For theory on public sector information systems, the proposed model has generalizable potential for the analysis of socio-technical systems and offers future research directions.

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {The construction of self-sovereign identity: Extending the interpretive flexibility of technology towards institutions}, author = {Weigl, L. and Barbereau, T. and Fridgen, G.}, url = {https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0740624X23000734}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2023.101873}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-10-16}, journal = {Government Information Quarterly}, volume = {40}, issue = {4}, pages = {}, abstract = {Ever-growing concerns over ‘Big Brother’ continue driving individuals towards user-centric identity management systems. Nascent innovations are framed as offering Self-Sovereign Identity (SSI). Because of the association with value-laden ideals and technical components like blockchain, SSI is caught up with both hype and idiosyncrasy. Competing interpretations of SSI damage the public discourse and risk misrepresenting affordances these systems might offer. Based on a qualitative inductive interview study and document analysis, this article extrapolates a constructivist theoretical frame – the Extended Model of Interpretive Flexibility – which combines insights from the Social Construction of Technology and the Structurational Model of Technology. The Extended Model of Interpretive Flexibility highlights malleability in the technical implementations and social representations, which in turn is affected by and influences institutional properties around SSI. This research further offers implications for practice around the implementation of SSI, in particular regarding policy, management, and design. For theory on public sector information systems, the proposed model has generalizable potential for the analysis of socio-technical systems and offers future research directions.}, }

EU copyright law round up – third trimester of 2023 external link

Trapova, A. & Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2023

Copyright

Bibtex

Online publication{nokey, title = {EU copyright law round up – third trimester of 2023}, author = {Trapova, A. and Quintais, J.}, url = {https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2023/10/02/eu-copyright-law-round-up-third-trimester-of-2023/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-10-02}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {Copyright}, }

Opinie: Koranverbrandingen in Zweden, Denemarken en Nederland

Nederlands Juristenblad (NJB), iss. : 29, num: 2125, pp: 2480-2482, 2023

Abstract

De stelling van onder andere de Minister van Justitie dat het verbranden van boeken nu eenmaal mag in onze rechtsstaat berust op een dubbele dwaling: één omtrent het object van de vrijheid van meningsuiting en één omtrent hoe in deze tijd van sociale media om te gaan met het conflict tussen de vrijheid van meningsuiting en de vrijheid van godsdienst.

vrijheid van godsdienst, vrijheid van meninguiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Opinie: Koranverbrandingen in Zweden, Denemarken en Nederland}, author = {Dommering, E.}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-10-05}, journal = {Nederlands Juristenblad (NJB)}, issue = {29}, number = {2125}, abstract = {De stelling van onder andere de Minister van Justitie dat het verbranden van boeken nu eenmaal mag in onze rechtsstaat berust op een dubbele dwaling: één omtrent het object van de vrijheid van meningsuiting en één omtrent hoe in deze tijd van sociale media om te gaan met het conflict tussen de vrijheid van meningsuiting en de vrijheid van godsdienst.}, keywords = {vrijheid van godsdienst, vrijheid van meninguiting}, }

Editorial: Open Access: we zijn er bijna – maar tegen welke prijs? download

Auteursrecht, iss. : 3, pp: 101-102, 2023

Copyright, open access

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Editorial: Open Access: we zijn er bijna – maar tegen welke prijs?}, author = {Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/nl/publications/open-access-we-zijn-er-bijna-maar-tegen-welke-prijs/auteursrecht_2023_3_editorial/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-10-03}, journal = {Auteursrecht}, issue = {3}, keywords = {Copyright, open access}, }

An Interdisciplinary Toolbox for Researching the AI-Act external link

Verfassungsblog, 2023

Artificial intelligence

Bibtex

Online publication{nokey, title = {An Interdisciplinary Toolbox for Researching the AI-Act}, author = {Metikoš, L.}, url = {https://verfassungsblog.de/an-interdisciplinary-toolbox-for-researching-the-ai-act/}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.17176/20230908-062850-0}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-09-08}, journal = {Verfassungsblog}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence}, }

Designing a freedom of expression-compliant framework for moral rights in the EU: challenges and proposals

Geiger, C. & Izyumenko, E.
Research Handbook on Intellectual Property and Moral Rights, Edward Elgar Publishing, 2023, pp: 292–314, ISBN: 9781789904864

Abstract

In the discussions on copyright and freedom of expression, it is common to focus on copy-right’s economic rights and their potential to restrict the users’ freedom of artistic creativity, freedom to express criticism or freedom to receive and impart information. By contrast, moral rights of the authors (such as the right of divulgation, the right of attribution and the right of integrity) have been much less explored with regard to their potential conflict with creators’ and users’ freedom of expression. Without doubt, moral rights are at the core of copyright protection, in particular in systems following the so-called “civil law” tradition. Their protection represents an important interest that can claim fundamental rights foundations. On a more general level, moral rights can emanate from the need to protect the authors’ dignity and personality - the values underlying a number of fundamental rights in the human rights treaties. More specifically, certain scholars allocate the interest in the protection of the authors’ moral rights in the right to privacy and personal integrity, others - in the so-called “negative” aspect of the right to freedom of expression - the right not to speak and to be free from unwanted associations. Either one way or another, however, the interest of the author in the protection of her personality via moral rights should not be accorded absolute and hence unqualified protection. In particular, competing freedom of expression interests of users (including derivative creators) must not be neglected as a result of such protection. The argument of this chapter is that, despite a relative lack of attention towards the effects of moral rights on the freedom of expression of others, moral rights, if applied in an unlimited way, might impede users’ freedoms even to a greater extent than economic rights of copyright holders. The problem thus deserves further scrutiny and solutions need to be advanced to guarantee that uses of copyright-protected works that are essential for a democratic society are not unduly hindered by moral rights.

Freedom of expression, moral rights

Bibtex

Chapter{nokey, title = {Designing a freedom of expression-compliant framework for moral rights in the EU: challenges and proposals}, author = {Geiger, C. and Izyumenko, E.}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789904871.00028}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-09-12}, abstract = {In the discussions on copyright and freedom of expression, it is common to focus on copy-right’s economic rights and their potential to restrict the users’ freedom of artistic creativity, freedom to express criticism or freedom to receive and impart information. By contrast, moral rights of the authors (such as the right of divulgation, the right of attribution and the right of integrity) have been much less explored with regard to their potential conflict with creators’ and users’ freedom of expression. Without doubt, moral rights are at the core of copyright protection, in particular in systems following the so-called “civil law” tradition. Their protection represents an important interest that can claim fundamental rights foundations. On a more general level, moral rights can emanate from the need to protect the authors’ dignity and personality - the values underlying a number of fundamental rights in the human rights treaties. More specifically, certain scholars allocate the interest in the protection of the authors’ moral rights in the right to privacy and personal integrity, others - in the so-called “negative” aspect of the right to freedom of expression - the right not to speak and to be free from unwanted associations. Either one way or another, however, the interest of the author in the protection of her personality via moral rights should not be accorded absolute and hence unqualified protection. In particular, competing freedom of expression interests of users (including derivative creators) must not be neglected as a result of such protection. The argument of this chapter is that, despite a relative lack of attention towards the effects of moral rights on the freedom of expression of others, moral rights, if applied in an unlimited way, might impede users’ freedoms even to a greater extent than economic rights of copyright holders. The problem thus deserves further scrutiny and solutions need to be advanced to guarantee that uses of copyright-protected works that are essential for a democratic society are not unduly hindered by moral rights.}, keywords = {Freedom of expression, moral rights}, }