Abstract
The General Court's judgments in Case T-442/08 and related cases annulled Article 3 of the Commission's 2008 decision against CISAC and 20 collecting societies, on the basis of the Commission's failure to prove the required evidentiary legal standard for the existence of a concerted practice on national territorial limitations. These judgments should have an impact on the legislative process of the proposed Directive on collective rights management, namely in what concerns the multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses.
Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom
Bibtex
Article{nokey,
title = {The empire strikes back: CISAC beats Commission in General Court},
author = {Quintais, J.},
url = {http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/9/680.abstract},
year = {0813},
date = {2013-08-13},
journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice},
number = {9},
abstract = {The General Court's judgments in Case T-442/08 and related cases annulled Article 3 of the Commission's 2008 decision against CISAC and 20 collecting societies, on the basis of the Commission's failure to prove the required evidentiary legal standard for the existence of a concerted practice on national territorial limitations. These judgments should have an impact on the legislative process of the proposed Directive on collective rights management, namely in what concerns the multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online uses.},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom},
}