International Assistance and Media Democratization in the Western Balkans: A Cross-National Comparison external link

Global Media Journal German Edition, num: 2, 2014

Abstract

International media assistance programs accompanied the democratic media transition in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia and Serbia with varying intensity. These countries untertook a range of media reforms to conform with accession requirements of the European Union (EU) and the standards of the Council of Europe, among others. This article explores the nexus between the democratic transformation of the media and international media assistance (IMA) as constrained by the local political conditions in the five countries of the Western Balkans. It aims to enhance the understanding of conditions and factors that influence media institution building in the region and evaluates the role of international assistance programs and conditionality mechanisms herein. The cross-national analysis concludes that the effects of IMA are highly constrained by the local context. A decade of IMA of varying intensity is not sufficient to construct media institutions when, in order to function properly, they have to outperform their local context. From today’s vantage point it becomes obvious, that in the short-term scaling-up IMA does not necessarily improve outcomes. The experiences in the region suggest that imported solutions have not been sufficiently cognitive of all aspects of local conditions and international strategies have tended to be rather schematic and have lacked strategic approaches to promote media policy stability, credible media reform and implementation. To a certain extent, the loss of IMA effectiveness is also self-inflicted.

cross-national comparison, Democratic transformation, international media assistance, media institutions, Mediarecht, Western Balkan countries

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {International Assistance and Media Democratization in the Western Balkans: A Cross-National Comparison}, author = {Irion, K.}, url = {http://www.db-thueringen.de/servlets/DerivateServlet/Derivate-31141/GMJ8_Irion_Jusic_final.pdf}, year = {1121}, date = {2014-11-21}, journal = {Global Media Journal German Edition}, number = {2}, abstract = {International media assistance programs accompanied the democratic media transition in Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Kosovo, Macedonia and Serbia with varying intensity. These countries untertook a range of media reforms to conform with accession requirements of the European Union (EU) and the standards of the Council of Europe, among others. This article explores the nexus between the democratic transformation of the media and international media assistance (IMA) as constrained by the local political conditions in the five countries of the Western Balkans. It aims to enhance the understanding of conditions and factors that influence media institution building in the region and evaluates the role of international assistance programs and conditionality mechanisms herein. The cross-national analysis concludes that the effects of IMA are highly constrained by the local context. A decade of IMA of varying intensity is not sufficient to construct media institutions when, in order to function properly, they have to outperform their local context. From today’s vantage point it becomes obvious, that in the short-term scaling-up IMA does not necessarily improve outcomes. The experiences in the region suggest that imported solutions have not been sufficiently cognitive of all aspects of local conditions and international strategies have tended to be rather schematic and have lacked strategic approaches to promote media policy stability, credible media reform and implementation. To a certain extent, the loss of IMA effectiveness is also self-inflicted.}, keywords = {cross-national comparison, Democratic transformation, international media assistance, media institutions, Mediarecht, Western Balkan countries}, }

Privacy in het Post-NSA tijdperk: tijd voor een fundamentele herziening? external link

Nederlands Juristenblad, num: 17, pp: 1172-1179., 2014

Abstract

De recente NSA-affaire heeft een brede technologische ontwikkeling blootgelegd waarin zeer grote hoeveelheden persoonsgegevens worden verzameld, opgeslagen en verwerkt, zonder dat dit een vooraf en helder bepaald doel heeft. Alhoewel dit evidente privacyproblemen met zich meebrengt, lijken de meeste privacydoctrines, waarvan in Europa de belangrijkste artikel 8 EVRM is, niet toegesneden op deze nieuwe ontwikkeling.

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Privacy in het Post-NSA tijdperk: tijd voor een fundamentele herziening?}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1438.pdf}, year = {0506}, date = {2014-05-06}, journal = {Nederlands Juristenblad}, number = {17}, abstract = {De recente NSA-affaire heeft een brede technologische ontwikkeling blootgelegd waarin zeer grote hoeveelheden persoonsgegevens worden verzameld, opgeslagen en verwerkt, zonder dat dit een vooraf en helder bepaald doel heeft. Alhoewel dit evidente privacyproblemen met zich meebrengt, lijken de meeste privacydoctrines, waarvan in Europa de belangrijkste artikel 8 EVRM is, niet toegesneden op deze nieuwe ontwikkeling.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Privacy in the Post-NSA Era: Time for a Fundamental Revision? external link

JIPITEC, num: 1, 2014

Abstract

Big Brother Watch and others have filed a complaint against the United Kingdom under the European Convention on Human Rights about a violation of Article 8, the right to privacy. It regards the NSA affair and UK-based surveillance activities operated by secret services. The question is whether it will be declared admissible and, if so, whether the European Court of Human Rights will find a violation. This article discusses three possible challenges for these types of complaints and analyses whether the current privacy paradigm is still adequate in view of the development known as Big Data.

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Privacy in the Post-NSA Era: Time for a Fundamental Revision?}, author = {van der Sloot, B.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1437.pdf}, year = {0506}, date = {2014-05-06}, journal = {JIPITEC}, number = {1}, abstract = {Big Brother Watch and others have filed a complaint against the United Kingdom under the European Convention on Human Rights about a violation of Article 8, the right to privacy. It regards the NSA affair and UK-based surveillance activities operated by secret services. The question is whether it will be declared admissible and, if so, whether the European Court of Human Rights will find a violation. This article discusses three possible challenges for these types of complaints and analyses whether the current privacy paradigm is still adequate in view of the development known as Big Data.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }

Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 april 2014 (Hi Hotel / Spoering) external link

AMI, num: 4, pp: 117-120., 2014

Abstract

Internationale bevoegdheid rechter bij grensoverschrijdende inbreuk auteursrecht. EEX-Verordening (EG) nr. 44/2001. Bepaling van plaats waar schadebrengende feit zich heeft voorgedaan. Plaats van intreden beweerde schade.

Auteursrecht, EEX-Verordening nr. 44/2001, grensoverschrijdende inbreuk, Intellectuele eigendom, plaats van intreden schade

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Annotatie bij Hof van Justitie EU 3 april 2014 (Hi Hotel / Spoering)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1436.pdf}, year = {1113}, date = {2014-11-13}, journal = {AMI}, number = {4}, abstract = {Internationale bevoegdheid rechter bij grensoverschrijdende inbreuk auteursrecht. EEX-Verordening (EG) nr. 44/2001. Bepaling van plaats waar schadebrengende feit zich heeft voorgedaan. Plaats van intreden beweerde schade.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, EEX-Verordening nr. 44/2001, grensoverschrijdende inbreuk, Intellectuele eigendom, plaats van intreden schade}, }

Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 24 februari 2014 (SDC Verifier / Femto Engineering) external link

AMI, num: 5, pp: 169-173., 2014

Abstract

Vordering wapperverbod. Software door auteurs in meerdere landen gemaakt. Internationaal privaatrecht. Conflictregel. Vraag aan wie auteursrechten toekomen beheerst door recht van elk land waarvoor bescherming wordt ingeroepen (lex protectionis).

Auteursrecht, conflictregel, Intellectuele eigendom, internationaal privaatrecht, lex protectionis, Software, wapperverbod

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Annotatie bij Vzr. Rb. Den Haag 24 februari 2014 (SDC Verifier / Femto Engineering)}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1435.pdf}, year = {1113}, date = {2014-11-13}, journal = {AMI}, number = {5}, abstract = {Vordering wapperverbod. Software door auteurs in meerdere landen gemaakt. Internationaal privaatrecht. Conflictregel. Vraag aan wie auteursrechten toekomen beheerst door recht van elk land waarvoor bescherming wordt ingeroepen (lex protectionis).}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, conflictregel, Intellectuele eigendom, internationaal privaatrecht, lex protectionis, Software, wapperverbod}, }

Deltaplan voor online privacy & beveiliging external link

Het Financieele Dagblad, 2014

cybersecurity, data retention, ECHR, Grondrechten, hacking, NSA, Privacy, Surveillance, wiretapping

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Deltaplan voor online privacy & beveiliging}, author = {Arnbak, A.}, url = {https://www.axelarnbak.nl/2014/11/04/derde-column-in-financieele-dagblad-deltaplan-online-privacy-en-beveiliging/}, year = {1106}, date = {2014-11-06}, journal = {Het Financieele Dagblad}, keywords = {cybersecurity, data retention, ECHR, Grondrechten, hacking, NSA, Privacy, Surveillance, wiretapping}, }

Filteren is gewoon censuur, en daarmee basta external link

Tijdschrift voor Internetrecht, num: 5, pp: 124-125., 2008

Abstract

De informele methoden waarmee Justitie en politie de toegang tot bepaalde sites proberen te beletten zijn een vorm van door de Grondwet verboden censuur.

Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Filteren is gewoon censuur, en daarmee basta}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/1433.pdf}, year = {1223}, date = {2008-12-23}, journal = {Tijdschrift voor Internetrecht}, number = {5}, abstract = {De informele methoden waarmee Justitie en politie de toegang tot bepaalde sites proberen te beletten zijn een vorm van door de Grondwet verboden censuur.}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Behavioural Sciences and the Regulation of Privacy on the Internet external link

Abstract

This chapter examines the policy implications of behavioural sciences insights for the regulation of privacy on the Internet, by focusing in particular on behavioural targeting. This marketing technique involves tracking people’s online behaviour to use the collected information to show people individually targeted advertisements. Enforcing data protection law may not be enough to protect privacy in this area. I argue that, if society is better off when certain behavioural targeting practices do not happen, policymakers should consider banning them.

behavioural economics, behavioural targeting, cookies, Data protection, e-Privacy Directive, Grondrechten, nudge, nudging, Privacy, profiling, tracking

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Behavioural Sciences and the Regulation of Privacy on the Internet}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2513771}, year = {1030}, date = {2014-10-30}, abstract = {This chapter examines the policy implications of behavioural sciences insights for the regulation of privacy on the Internet, by focusing in particular on behavioural targeting. This marketing technique involves tracking people’s online behaviour to use the collected information to show people individually targeted advertisements. Enforcing data protection law may not be enough to protect privacy in this area. I argue that, if society is better off when certain behavioural targeting practices do not happen, policymakers should consider banning them.}, keywords = {behavioural economics, behavioural targeting, cookies, Data protection, e-Privacy Directive, Grondrechten, nudge, nudging, Privacy, profiling, tracking}, }

Google Spain v. González: Did the Court forget about freedom of expression? external link

European Journal of Risk Regulation, num: 3, 2014

Abstract

In this note we discuss the controversial judgment in Google Spain v. González of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Our focus is on the judgment’s implications for freedom of expression. First, the facts of the case and the CJEU’s judgment are summarised. We then argue that the CJEU did not give enough attention to the right to freedom of expression. By seeing a search engine operator as a controller regarding the processing of personal data on third party web pages, the CJEU assigns the operator the delicate task of balancing the fundamental rights at stake. However, such an operator may not be the most appropriate party to balance the rights of all involved parties, in particular in cases where such a balance is hard to strike. Furthermore, it is a departure from human rights doctrine that according to the CJEU privacy and data protection rights override, “as a rule”, the public’s right to receive information. In addition, after the judgement it has become unclear whether search engine operators have a legal basis for indexing websites that contain special categories of data. We also discuss steps taken by Google to comply with the judgment.

Data protection, Freedom of expression, Grondrechten, intermediary liability, Privacy, right to be forgotten, search engines, Vrijheid van meningsuiting

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Google Spain v. González: Did the Court forget about freedom of expression?}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. and Kulk, S.}, url = {http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2491486}, year = {1030}, date = {2014-10-30}, journal = {European Journal of Risk Regulation}, number = {3}, abstract = {In this note we discuss the controversial judgment in Google Spain v. González of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). Our focus is on the judgment’s implications for freedom of expression. First, the facts of the case and the CJEU’s judgment are summarised. We then argue that the CJEU did not give enough attention to the right to freedom of expression. By seeing a search engine operator as a controller regarding the processing of personal data on third party web pages, the CJEU assigns the operator the delicate task of balancing the fundamental rights at stake. However, such an operator may not be the most appropriate party to balance the rights of all involved parties, in particular in cases where such a balance is hard to strike. Furthermore, it is a departure from human rights doctrine that according to the CJEU privacy and data protection rights override, “as a rule”, the public’s right to receive information. In addition, after the judgement it has become unclear whether search engine operators have a legal basis for indexing websites that contain special categories of data. We also discuss steps taken by Google to comply with the judgment.}, keywords = {Data protection, Freedom of expression, Grondrechten, intermediary liability, Privacy, right to be forgotten, search engines, Vrijheid van meningsuiting}, }

Inzage in de minuten van de asielprocedure: persoonsgegevens of geen persoonsgegevens? external link

Asiel & Migrantenrecht, num: 7, 2014

Grondrechten, Privacy

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Inzage in de minuten van de asielprocedure: persoonsgegevens of geen persoonsgegevens?}, author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F.}, url = {http://www.asielenmigrantenrecht.nl/inhoudsopgave.cfm?jr=2014&nr=7}, year = {1030}, date = {2014-10-30}, journal = {Asiel & Migrantenrecht}, number = {7}, keywords = {Grondrechten, Privacy}, }