Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting
Other{nokey,
title = {Vrijheid van meningsuiting, groepsbelediging en haatzaaien},
author = {Nieuwenhuis, A.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/25_jaar_Mediaforum.pdf},
year = {1206},
date = {2013-12-06},
keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting},
} Mediarecht
Other{nokey,
title = {RTL-Véronique: toegang commerciële omroep tot de Nederlandse markt},
author = {van Eijk, N.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/25_jaar_Mediaforum.pdf},
year = {1206},
date = {2013-12-06},
keywords = {Mediarecht},
} Mediarecht
Other{nokey,
title = {Handeldrijvende middenstand tegen Grijpgraag Grootkapitaal: markt intern Verlag GmbH en Klaus Beermann tegen Bondsrepubliek Duitsland},
author = {Kabel, J.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/25jaarMediaforum.pdf},
year = {1129},
date = {2013-11-29},
abstract = {De Markt intern uitspraak van het Europese Hof tot bescherming van de rechten van de mens uit 1989 heeft veel stof doen opwaaien vanwege de omstreden classificatie door een nipte meerderheid van een redactioneel artikel als commerciële informatie mét de bijbehorende consequenties voor de beoordeling ervan door de nationale rechter. In dit artikel worden de politieke en maatschappelijke achtergronden van de publicatie belicht, de uitspraak van het Hof bekritiseerd en bezien hoe vandaag de dag een publicatie als de litigieuze door de Europese en de Nederlandse rechter ziou worden beoordeeld.},
keywords = {Mediarecht},
} Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom
Case note{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 29 maart 2013 (Broeren / Duijsens)},
author = {},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_504.pdf},
year = {1121},
date = {2013-11-21},
journal = {NJ},
number = {46},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom},
} Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom
Other{nokey,
title = {Gezamelijke annotatie bij Stokke-arresten},
author = {},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_504.pdf},
year = {1121},
date = {2013-11-21},
journal = {NJ},
number = {46},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom},
} Telecommunicatierecht
Article{nokey,
title = {De zakelijke gebruiker, een juridische fictie},
author = {van Eijk, N.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/BTG_magazine_83.pdf},
year = {1112},
date = {2013-11-12},
journal = {BTG Magazine},
number = {83},
keywords = {Telecommunicatierecht},
} Telecommunicatierecht
Article{nokey,
title = {Over koekjes en muren},
author = {van Eijk, N.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/BTG_magazine_82.pdf},
year = {1112},
date = {2013-11-12},
journal = {BTG Magazine},
number = {82},
keywords = {Telecommunicatierecht},
} Consumentenrecht
Report{nokey,
title = {Form matters: informing consumers effectively},
author = {Helberger, N.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Form_matters.pdf},
year = {1107},
date = {2013-11-07},
abstract = {This study examines what lessons can be learned from behavioural research for the form in which consumer information is being presented. The argument that this study makes is that the form in which information is presented and the effective communication of such information is at least as important as its content, and that this is an aspect that is still generally neglected in information and consumer law. The study is particularly interested in the potential of digital technologies in making consumer information more effective, and new approaches to form requirements in areas in which the importance of effective communication has already been acknowledged, such as in communications law. The study concludes with concrete suggestions for the future design of transparency requirements in information law and policy.},
keywords = {Consumentenrecht},
} Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting
Case note{nokey,
title = {Annotatie bij EHRM 14 februari 2012 (Romet / Nederland)},
author = {Dommering, E.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2013_484.pdf},
year = {1101},
date = {2013-11-01},
journal = {NJ},
number = {45},
keywords = {Grondrechten, Vrijheid van meningsuiting},
} Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom
Article{vanGompel2013,
title = {On the prospects of raising the originality requirement in copyright law: Perspectives from the Humanities},
author = {van Gompel, S. and Lavik, E.},
url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/JCS_2013_3.pdf
https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2347361},
year = {1024},
date = {2013-10-24},
journal = {Journal of the Copyright Society of the USA},
volume = {60},
number = {3},
pages = {387-443},
abstract = {In 1903, in <em>Bleistein v Donaldson Lithographing</em>, Justice Holmes famously concluded that judges are ill-suited to make merit judgments when determining the eligibility for protection of works. Subsequent courts and commentators have generally followed his caution. Yet, no one has thought through how the copyright system would work were Justice Holmes not heeded. What if courts were called upon to determine the aesthetic merit of a work? How would they go about it? And would they be able to separate the gold from the dross by drawing upon an aesthetic evaluation of such kind?},
keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom},
}