Copyright contract law: towards a statutory regulation? external link

pp: 1-146, 2004

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Copyright contract law: towards a statutory regulation?}, author = {Guibault, L. and Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/auteurscontractenrecht.pdf}, year = {0806}, date = {2004-08-06}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Auteurscontractenrecht: naar een wettelijke regeling? external link

pp: 146, 2004

Abstract

Deze studie, die is verricht in opdracht van het WODC (Ministerie van Justitie), strekt ertoe de behoefte aan specifieke wettelijke maatregelen in Nederland te inventariseren. In het onderzoek ligt het accent op de vanuit auteursrechtelijk of nabuurrechtelijk oogpunt meest wezenlijke aspecten van de exploitatieovereenkomst: formele vereisten, de omvang en interpretatie van de rechtenverlening, het recht op vergoeding, derdenwerking van de rechtenverlening en de mogelijkheid van herziening en beëindiging van de overeenkomst. Op basis van de bevindingen worden de hoofdlijnen van een mogelijke wettelijke regeling geschetst.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Auteurscontractenrecht: naar een wettelijke regeling?}, author = {Guibault, L. and Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/auteurscontractenrecht.pdf}, year = {0721}, date = {2004-07-21}, abstract = {Deze studie, die is verricht in opdracht van het WODC (Ministerie van Justitie), strekt ertoe de behoefte aan specifieke wettelijke maatregelen in Nederland te inventariseren. In het onderzoek ligt het accent op de vanuit auteursrechtelijk of nabuurrechtelijk oogpunt meest wezenlijke aspecten van de exploitatieovereenkomst: formele vereisten, de omvang en interpretatie van de rechtenverlening, het recht op vergoeding, derdenwerking van de rechtenverlening en de mogelijkheid van herziening en beëindiging van de overeenkomst. Op basis van de bevindingen worden de hoofdlijnen van een mogelijke wettelijke regeling geschetst.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Copyright Law and Consumer Protection external link

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of certain key aspects of the relationship between copyright law and consumer protection. More particularly, the paper concentrates on what would appear today as the most problematic issue, from the perspective of the consumer, understood in the narrow sense of the word, namely the implementation of technological protection measures (TPM) and digital rights management (DRM) systems and its implication for the exercise of the private use exemption.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Copyright Law and Consumer Protection}, author = {Guibault, L. and Helberger, N.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/copyrightlawconsumerprotection.pdf}, year = {0520}, date = {2005-05-20}, abstract = {The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of certain key aspects of the relationship between copyright law and consumer protection. More particularly, the paper concentrates on what would appear today as the most problematic issue, from the perspective of the consumer, understood in the narrow sense of the word, namely the implementation of technological protection measures (TPM) and digital rights management (DRM) systems and its implication for the exercise of the private use exemption.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

The Future of the Public Domain – Identifying the Commons in Information Law external link

Kluwer Law International , 2006, Series: Information Law Series, ISBN: 9041124357

Abstract

The presence of a robust public domain is an essential precondition for cultural, social and economic development and for a healthy democratic process. But the public domain is under pressure as a result of the ongoing march towards an information economy. This book takes a broad, 'information law' oriented approach towards the question of preservering the public domain, in which a wide range of interrelated legal questions converge. Thirteen contributions from academia worldwide make up the present book, addressing the future of the public domain from a different angle. In addition, all authors were invited to reflect upon the notion and role of the public domain in the context of information law and policy.

Kluwer Information Law Series

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {The Future of the Public Domain – Identifying the Commons in Information Law}, author = {Guibault, L. and Hugenholtz, P.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/322.pdf}, year = {2006}, date = {2006-06-16}, abstract = {The presence of a robust public domain is an essential precondition for cultural, social and economic development and for a healthy democratic process. But the public domain is under pressure as a result of the ongoing march towards an information economy. This book takes a broad, 'information law' oriented approach towards the question of preservering the public domain, in which a wide range of interrelated legal questions converge. Thirteen contributions from academia worldwide make up the present book, addressing the future of the public domain from a different angle. In addition, all authors were invited to reflect upon the notion and role of the public domain in the context of information law and policy.}, keywords = {Kluwer Information Law Series}, }

Collective Management in the European Union external link

Guibault, L. & van Gompel, S.
2007

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Other{nokey, title = {Collective Management in the European Union}, author = {Guibault, L. and van Gompel, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/collective_management_in_the_european_union.pdf}, year = {0320}, date = {2007-03-20}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Halleluja: Buma’s aansluitvoorwaarden krijgen zegen van NMa! external link

AMI, num: 4, pp: 85-93, 2008

Intellectuele eigendom, Naburige rechten

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Halleluja: Buma’s aansluitvoorwaarden krijgen zegen van NMa!}, author = {Guibault, L.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/buma_cc_pilot.pdf}, year = {0727}, date = {2008-07-27}, journal = {AMI}, number = {4}, keywords = {Intellectuele eigendom, Naburige rechten}, }

Why Cherry Picking Never Leads to Harmonisation: The Case of the Limitations on Copyright under Directive 2001/29/EC external link

Jipitec, num: 2, pp: 55-66, 2010

Abstract

The article examines whether the norms laid down in the Directive in relation to the exceptions and limitations on copyright and related rights can be conducive to a sensible degree of harmonisation across the European Union. Before discussing the degree of harmonisation achieved so far by the Directive, the first part gives a short overview of the main characteristics of the list op exceptions and limitations contained in Article 5 of the Directive. A comprehensive review of the implementation of each limitation by the Member States is beyond the scope of this article. The following section takes a closer look at three examples of limitations that have led to legislative changes at the Member State level as express measures towards the implementation of the Information Society Directive, that is, the limitations for the benefit of libraries, for teaching and research, and for persons with a disability. These exceptions and limitations were later on also identified by the European Commission as key elements in the deployment of a digital knowledge economy. The analysis will show that the implementation of the provisions on limitations in the Information Society Directive did not, and probably cannot, yield the expected level of harmonisation across the European Union and that, as a consequence, there still exists a significant degree of uncertainty for the stakeholders regarding the extent of permissible acts with respect to copyright protected works.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Why Cherry Picking Never Leads to Harmonisation: The Case of the Limitations on Copyright under Directive 2001/29/EC}, author = {Guibault, L.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/JIPITEC_2010_2.pdf}, year = {0910}, date = {2010-09-10}, journal = {Jipitec}, number = {2}, abstract = {The article examines whether the norms laid down in the Directive in relation to the exceptions and limitations on copyright and related rights can be conducive to a sensible degree of harmonisation across the European Union. Before discussing the degree of harmonisation achieved so far by the Directive, the first part gives a short overview of the main characteristics of the list op exceptions and limitations contained in Article 5 of the Directive. A comprehensive review of the implementation of each limitation by the Member States is beyond the scope of this article. The following section takes a closer look at three examples of limitations that have led to legislative changes at the Member State level as express measures towards the implementation of the Information Society Directive, that is, the limitations for the benefit of libraries, for teaching and research, and for persons with a disability. These exceptions and limitations were later on also identified by the European Commission as key elements in the deployment of a digital knowledge economy. The analysis will show that the implementation of the provisions on limitations in the Information Society Directive did not, and probably cannot, yield the expected level of harmonisation across the European Union and that, as a consequence, there still exists a significant degree of uncertainty for the stakeholders regarding the extent of permissible acts with respect to copyright protected works.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }