Digitale drempels: Knelpunten voor legaal digitaal aanbod in de creatieve industrie external link

Weda, J., van der Noll, R., Akker, I., Leenheer, J., Poort, J. & van Gompel, S.
pp: 136, 2012

Abstract

Dit rapport beschrijft de knelpunten bij het tot stand komen van een volwaardige markt voor digitale distributie en exploitatie van muziek, films en series, games en boeken. Onderscheid wordt gemaakt tussen economische, juridische en technische knelpunten.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Digitale drempels: Knelpunten voor legaal digitaal aanbod in de creatieve industrie}, author = {Weda, J. and van der Noll, R. and Akker, I. and Leenheer, J. and Poort, J. and van Gompel, S.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/digitale_drempels.pdf}, year = {0710}, date = {2012-07-10}, abstract = {Dit rapport beschrijft de knelpunten bij het tot stand komen van een volwaardige markt voor digitale distributie en exploitatie van muziek, films en series, games en boeken. Onderscheid wordt gemaakt tussen economische, juridische en technische knelpunten.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Valuing commercial radio licences external link

European Journal of Law and Economics, pp: 1-23, 2012

Abstract

Within the EU regulatory framework, licensees for commercial radio broadcasting may be charged a fee to ensure optimal allocation of scarce resources but not to maximize public revenues. While radio licence renewal occurs in many EU countries, an objective, model-based approach for setting licence fees has not been used so far. In this paper, it is described how such a fee can be determined for the purpose of licence renewal or extension. National and regional Dutch FM licences were valued, taking into account that simulcast broadcasting of digital and analogue radio is obligatory upon extension. Licences are valued using discounted cash flow methodology, whereby the cash flows of an averagely efficient entrant are taken as the benchmark for valuation of each individual licence. Cash flows during the licence period 2011–2017 are forecast based on generalized least squares regressions, using financial variables of Dutch radio stations for the years 2004–2008. Separately, bottom-up cost and investment models are used to calculate analogue and digital distribution costs. This results in a value per licence, based on objective licence characteristics, which can be used to set licence fees if administrative renewal or extension is opted for instead of a new auction or beauty contest.

Telecommunicatierecht

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Valuing commercial radio licences}, author = {Poort, J. and van Eijk, N.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/184.pdf}, year = {0814}, date = {2012-08-14}, journal = {European Journal of Law and Economics}, abstract = {Within the EU regulatory framework, licensees for commercial radio broadcasting may be charged a fee to ensure optimal allocation of scarce resources but not to maximize public revenues. While radio licence renewal occurs in many EU countries, an objective, model-based approach for setting licence fees has not been used so far. In this paper, it is described how such a fee can be determined for the purpose of licence renewal or extension. National and regional Dutch FM licences were valued, taking into account that simulcast broadcasting of digital and analogue radio is obligatory upon extension. Licences are valued using discounted cash flow methodology, whereby the cash flows of an averagely efficient entrant are taken as the benchmark for valuation of each individual licence. Cash flows during the licence period 2011–2017 are forecast based on generalized least squares regressions, using financial variables of Dutch radio stations for the years 2004–2008. Separately, bottom-up cost and investment models are used to calculate analogue and digital distribution costs. This results in a value per licence, based on objective licence characteristics, which can be used to set licence fees if administrative renewal or extension is opted for instead of a new auction or beauty contest.}, keywords = {Telecommunicatierecht}, }

Filesharing 2@12: Downloaden in Nederland external link

pp: 61, 2012

Abstract

Dit rapport doet verslag van een consumentenonderzoek naar het downloaden en streamen van muziek, films, tv-series en tv-programma’s, games en boeken. Daarbij is onderscheid gemaakt tussen vier kanalen: het kopen van materiaal op fysieke dragers in een winkel of webwinkel, betaald downloaden of streamen uit legale bron, onbetaald downloaden of streamen uit legale bron en het downloaden of streamen uit illegale bron (filesharing). Downloaden uit illegale bron blijkt op de derde plaats te komen, na fysieke dragers en gratis legaal aanbod. Verder blijkt dat het downloaden uit illegale bron op zijn retour is: 27,2% van de bevolking downloadde het afgelopen jaar uit illegale bron, in 2008 was dat nog 35%. Dit komt door een sterke afname bij muziek, terwijl er nog een toename was bij films en series. Het downloaden van games is gelijk gebleven, het downloaden van boeken uit illegale bron is in opkomst en wordt inmiddels door evenveel mensen gedaan als het downloaden van games. Downloaden en kopen gaan nog altijd hand in hand: mensen die wel eens downloaden uit illegale bron kopen vaker ook content via de legale kanalen, gaan vaker naar concerten en de bioscoop en kopen vaker merchandise. Ook blijkt uit het onderzoek dat het blokkeren van de toegang tot The Pirate Bay nauwelijks effect heeft gehad: driekwart van de respondenten downloadde al niet (meer) uit illegale bron en van degenen voor wie de blokkade bedoeld is, rapporteert driekwart geen verandering.

Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Filesharing 2@12: Downloaden in Nederland}, author = {Poort, J.}, url = {http://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Filesharing_2012.pdf}, year = {1018}, date = {2012-10-18}, abstract = {Dit rapport doet verslag van een consumentenonderzoek naar het downloaden en streamen van muziek, films, tv-series en tv-programma’s, games en boeken. Daarbij is onderscheid gemaakt tussen vier kanalen: het kopen van materiaal op fysieke dragers in een winkel of webwinkel, betaald downloaden of streamen uit legale bron, onbetaald downloaden of streamen uit legale bron en het downloaden of streamen uit illegale bron (filesharing). Downloaden uit illegale bron blijkt op de derde plaats te komen, na fysieke dragers en gratis legaal aanbod. Verder blijkt dat het downloaden uit illegale bron op zijn retour is: 27,2% van de bevolking downloadde het afgelopen jaar uit illegale bron, in 2008 was dat nog 35%. Dit komt door een sterke afname bij muziek, terwijl er nog een toename was bij films en series. Het downloaden van games is gelijk gebleven, het downloaden van boeken uit illegale bron is in opkomst en wordt inmiddels door evenveel mensen gedaan als het downloaden van games. Downloaden en kopen gaan nog altijd hand in hand: mensen die wel eens downloaden uit illegale bron kopen vaker ook content via de legale kanalen, gaan vaker naar concerten en de bioscoop en kopen vaker merchandise. Ook blijkt uit het onderzoek dat het blokkeren van de toegang tot The Pirate Bay nauwelijks effect heeft gehad: driekwart van de respondenten downloadde al niet (meer) uit illegale bron en van degenen voor wie de blokkade bedoeld is, rapporteert driekwart geen verandering.}, keywords = {Intellectuele eigendom}, }

On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU should consider collective management of P2P external link

Munich Intellectual Property Law Center, 0807, Series: MIPLC, ISBN: 978-3-8329-7638-5

Abstract

This book analyzes the E.U.’s approach to P2P, a digital age technology that highlights the tensions between the Internet and a territorial and fragmented copyright law. It aims at providing the necessary legal qualification and context to understand why the E.U., while following an economic and socially onerous path, has thus far failed to achieve its deterrence goals. It is argued that a solution to this conundrum must be based on the use of copyright law and policy as tools for market organization and innovation growth, with respect for rights holders and users (sometimes) opposing interests and the existing legal framework. The best answer to mass online P2P uses seems to be that of collective rights management, as it offers an organized licensing and remuneration system compatible with the interests of stakeholders. This is especially true in the E.U., home to a developed and sophisticated market of CMOs, subject to numerous ECJ and Commission decisions, as well as varying E.U. institutional approaches, all pointing towards a preference for multi-territorial and pan-European licensing models. In this context, this book tests the compatibility of several non-voluntary and voluntary approaches to P2P with international treaties, the <i>acquis </i>or simply strategic policy considerations.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Book{nokey, title = {On Peers and Copyright: Why the EU should consider collective management of P2P}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://www.nomos-shop.de/Quintais-On-Peers-Copyright-Why-EU-Should-Consider-Collective-Management-of-P2P/productview.aspx?product=19336&pac=weco}, year = {0807}, date = {2012-08-07}, abstract = {This book analyzes the E.U.’s approach to P2P, a digital age technology that highlights the tensions between the Internet and a territorial and fragmented copyright law. It aims at providing the necessary legal qualification and context to understand why the E.U., while following an economic and socially onerous path, has thus far failed to achieve its deterrence goals. It is argued that a solution to this conundrum must be based on the use of copyright law and policy as tools for market organization and innovation growth, with respect for rights holders and users (sometimes) opposing interests and the existing legal framework. The best answer to mass online P2P uses seems to be that of collective rights management, as it offers an organized licensing and remuneration system compatible with the interests of stakeholders. This is especially true in the E.U., home to a developed and sophisticated market of CMOs, subject to numerous ECJ and Commission decisions, as well as varying E.U. institutional approaches, all pointing towards a preference for multi-territorial and pan-European licensing models. In this context, this book tests the compatibility of several non-voluntary and voluntary approaches to P2P with international treaties, the <i>acquis </i>or simply strategic policy considerations.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Proposal for a Directive on collective rights management and (some) multi-territorial licensing external link

European Intellectual Property Review, num: 2, pp: 65-73, 2013

Abstract

This article provides a brief descriptive analysis of the recent Proposal from the European Commission for a Directive on collective rights management and multi-territorial licensing. After setting the necessary background, it examines the Proposal's main provisions, focusing on those establishing a governance and transparency framework for collecting societies and multi-territorial licensing for online uses of musical works.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Proposal for a Directive on collective rights management and (some) multi-territorial licensing}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2351186}, year = {0131}, date = {2013-01-31}, journal = {European Intellectual Property Review}, number = {2}, abstract = {This article provides a brief descriptive analysis of the recent Proposal from the European Commission for a Directive on collective rights management and multi-territorial licensing. After setting the necessary background, it examines the Proposal\'s main provisions, focusing on those establishing a governance and transparency framework for collecting societies and multi-territorial licensing for online uses of musical works.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }

Dr Strangelaw, or how Portugal learned to stop worrying and love P2P external link

Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice, num: 3, pp: 193-196, 2013

Abstract

A recent decision by a Public Prosecutor in a criminal case in Portugal, based on an Opinion by the Prosecutor General's Office, considers download acts by peer-to-peer (P2P) users to be covered by the private use limitation, raises the possibility that acts of upload are also covered by it and considers IP addresses insufficient evidence upon which to prosecute users.

Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Dr Strangelaw, or how Portugal learned to stop worrying and love P2P}, author = {Quintais, J.}, url = {http://jiplp.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/3/193.abstract}, year = {0222}, date = {2013-02-22}, journal = {Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice}, number = {3}, abstract = {A recent decision by a Public Prosecutor in a criminal case in Portugal, based on an Opinion by the Prosecutor General's Office, considers download acts by peer-to-peer (P2P) users to be covered by the private use limitation, raises the possibility that acts of upload are also covered by it and considers IP addresses insufficient evidence upon which to prosecute users.}, keywords = {Auteursrecht, Intellectuele eigendom}, }