Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 13 december 2022 download

Intellectuele Eigendom & Reclamerecht (IER), iss. : 5, num: 33, pp: 313-316, 2024

Abstract

Roddelpraat. Online uitzending programma op YouTube-kanaal en website – laten horen geheel auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk van publiek bekend persoon zonder rechtvaardiging.

Copyright

Bibtex

Case note{nokey, title = {Annotatie bij Hof Amsterdam 13 december 2022}, author = {van Eechoud, M.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/annotatie-bij-hof-amsterdam-13-december-2022/ier-2023-33-roddelpraat-online-uitzending-programma-op-youtube-kanaal-en-website-laten-horen-geheel-auteursrechtelijk-beschermd-werk-van-publiek-bekend-persoon-zond/}, year = {2024}, date = {2024-01-23}, journal = {Intellectuele Eigendom & Reclamerecht (IER)}, issue = {5}, number = {33}, abstract = {Roddelpraat. Online uitzending programma op YouTube-kanaal en website – laten horen geheel auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk van publiek bekend persoon zonder rechtvaardiging.}, keywords = {Copyright}, }

Opinie: Koranverbranding wordt niet beschermd door de vrijheid van meningsuiting download

NRC Handelsblad, 2024

Abstract

Een boekverbranding is geen onderdeel van het uitwisselen van meningen met andersdenkenden, maar juist het tot zwijgen brengen van tegenstanders, stelt Egbert Dommering.

vrijheid van meninguiting

Bibtex

Newspaper article{nokey, title = {Opinie: Koranverbranding wordt niet beschermd door de vrijheid van meningsuiting}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/opinie-koranverbranding-wordt-niet-beschermd-door-de-vrijheid-van-meningsuiting/nrc_dommering/}, year = {2024}, date = {2024-01-18}, journal = {NRC Handelsblad}, abstract = {Een boekverbranding is geen onderdeel van het uitwisselen van meningen met andersdenkenden, maar juist het tot zwijgen brengen van tegenstanders, stelt Egbert Dommering.}, keywords = {vrijheid van meninguiting}, }

Developing Defences for Fashion Upcycling in EU Trademark Law

GRUR International, 2023

Abstract

Trademarked fashion items pose a particular obstacle to reuse projects in the circular economy. By granting broad exclusive rights, EU trademark law exposes sustainable reuse practices, such as upcycling, to allegations of infringement ranging from (post-sale) confusion to blurring, tarnishment and unfair freeriding. Against that background, this analysis explores strategies to assure fashion re-users that, as long as they do not specifically aim to mislead consumers or damage and exploit protected brand insignia, they can rework trademarked fashion items without risking the verdict of infringement. Two options for enhancing legal certainty will be explored: the first consists in adopting a strict test for ‘use as a trademark’ that could immunise sustainable fashion reuse against allegations of trademark infringement on the ground that consumers understand the specific reuse context and perceive third-party trademarks on circular economy products as mere decorative elements. The second option involves strengthening defences, in particular the referential use defence, by developing labelling guidelines that allow fashion re-users to ensure compliance with the requirement of honest practices in industrial or commercial matters.

Fashion, Trademark law

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Developing Defences for Fashion Upcycling in EU Trademark Law}, author = {Senftleben, M.}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1093/grurint/ikad131}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-12-21}, journal = {GRUR International}, abstract = {Trademarked fashion items pose a particular obstacle to reuse projects in the circular economy. By granting broad exclusive rights, EU trademark law exposes sustainable reuse practices, such as upcycling, to allegations of infringement ranging from (post-sale) confusion to blurring, tarnishment and unfair freeriding. Against that background, this analysis explores strategies to assure fashion re-users that, as long as they do not specifically aim to mislead consumers or damage and exploit protected brand insignia, they can rework trademarked fashion items without risking the verdict of infringement. Two options for enhancing legal certainty will be explored: the first consists in adopting a strict test for ‘use as a trademark’ that could immunise sustainable fashion reuse against allegations of trademark infringement on the ground that consumers understand the specific reuse context and perceive third-party trademarks on circular economy products as mere decorative elements. The second option involves strengthening defences, in particular the referential use defence, by developing labelling guidelines that allow fashion re-users to ensure compliance with the requirement of honest practices in industrial or commercial matters.}, keywords = {Fashion, Trademark law}, }

Copyright Content Moderation in the European Union: State of the Art, Ways Forward and Policy Recommendations external link

Quintais, J., Katzenbach, C., Schwemer, S., Dergacheva, D., Riis, T., Mezei, P., Harkai, I. & Magalhães, J.C.
IIC, vol. 55, pp: 157-177, 2024

Abstract

This Opinion describes and summarises the results of the interdisciplinary research carried out by the authors during the course of a three-year project on intermediaries’ practices regarding copyright content moderation. This research includes the mapping of the EU legal framework and intermediaries’ practices regarding copyright content moderation, the evaluation and measuring of the impact of moderation practices and technologies on access and diversity, and a set of policy recommendations. Our recommendations touch on the following topics: the definition of “online content-sharing service provider”; the recognition and operationalisation of user rights; the complementary nature of complaint and redress safeguards; the scope of permissible preventive filtering; the clarification of the relationship between Art. 17 of the new Copyright Directive and the Digital Services Act; monetisation and restrictive content moderation actions; recommender systems and copyright content moderation; transparency and data access for researchers; trade secret protection and transparency of content moderation systems; the relationship between the copyright acquis, the Digital Services Act and the upcoming Artificial Intelligence Act; and human competences in copyright content moderation.

Content moderation, Copyright, Digital services act, Digital Single Market, intermediaries, Platforms

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Copyright Content Moderation in the European Union: State of the Art, Ways Forward and Policy Recommendations}, author = {Quintais, J. and Katzenbach, C. and Schwemer, S. and Dergacheva, D. and Riis, T. and Mezei, P. and Harkai, I. and Magalhães, J.C.}, url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40319-023-01409-5}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01409-5}, year = {2024}, date = {2024-01-01}, journal = {IIC}, volume = {55}, pages = {157-177}, abstract = {This Opinion describes and summarises the results of the interdisciplinary research carried out by the authors during the course of a three-year project on intermediaries’ practices regarding copyright content moderation. This research includes the mapping of the EU legal framework and intermediaries’ practices regarding copyright content moderation, the evaluation and measuring of the impact of moderation practices and technologies on access and diversity, and a set of policy recommendations. Our recommendations touch on the following topics: the definition of “online content-sharing service provider”; the recognition and operationalisation of user rights; the complementary nature of complaint and redress safeguards; the scope of permissible preventive filtering; the clarification of the relationship between Art. 17 of the new Copyright Directive and the Digital Services Act; monetisation and restrictive content moderation actions; recommender systems and copyright content moderation; transparency and data access for researchers; trade secret protection and transparency of content moderation systems; the relationship between the copyright acquis, the Digital Services Act and the upcoming Artificial Intelligence Act; and human competences in copyright content moderation.}, keywords = {Content moderation, Copyright, Digital services act, Digital Single Market, intermediaries, Platforms}, }

EU copyright law round up – fourth trimester of 2023 external link

Trapova, A. & Quintais, J.
Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2024

Artificial intelligence, Copyright, EU

Bibtex

Online publication{nokey, title = {EU copyright law round up – fourth trimester of 2023}, author = {Trapova, A. and Quintais, J.}, url = {https://copyrightblog.kluweriplaw.com/2024/01/04/eu-copyright-law-round-up-fourth-trimester-of-2023/}, year = {2024}, date = {2024-01-04}, journal = {Kluwer Copyright Blog}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence, Copyright, EU}, }

Artificiële Intelligentie: waar is de werkelijkheid gebleven? download

Computerrecht, iss. : 6, num: 258, pp: 476-483, 2023

Abstract

Er is veel ophef ontstaan over de (te) snelle toepassing van AI in de samenleving. Dit artikel onderzoekt wat AI (in het bijzonder ChatGPT) is. Vervolgens laat het zien waar de invoering van AI al direct wringt in de gebieden van het auteursrecht, de privacy, vrijheid van meningsuiting, openbare besluitvorming en mededingingsrecht. Daarna wordt stilgestaan bij de vraag of de AI-verordening van de EU daar het antwoord op zal zijn. De conclusie is dat dat maar zeer ten dele zo is. Bescherming zal dus moeten komen van normen uit de deelgebieden. Het artikel formuleert tot slot vier beginselen die in ieder deelgebied een AI ‘metakader’ kunnen vormen waarmee een AI-product moet worden beoordeeld.

Artificial intelligence

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Artificiële Intelligentie: waar is de werkelijkheid gebleven?}, author = {Dommering, E.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/artificiele-intelligentie-waar-is-de-werkelijkheid-gebleven/ai-computerrecht-2023/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-12-05}, journal = {Computerrecht}, issue = {6}, number = {258}, abstract = {Er is veel ophef ontstaan over de (te) snelle toepassing van AI in de samenleving. Dit artikel onderzoekt wat AI (in het bijzonder ChatGPT) is. Vervolgens laat het zien waar de invoering van AI al direct wringt in de gebieden van het auteursrecht, de privacy, vrijheid van meningsuiting, openbare besluitvorming en mededingingsrecht. Daarna wordt stilgestaan bij de vraag of de AI-verordening van de EU daar het antwoord op zal zijn. De conclusie is dat dat maar zeer ten dele zo is. Bescherming zal dus moeten komen van normen uit de deelgebieden. Het artikel formuleert tot slot vier beginselen die in ieder deelgebied een AI ‘metakader’ kunnen vormen waarmee een AI-product moet worden beoordeeld.}, keywords = {Artificial intelligence}, }

Public interest content on audiovisual platforms: access and findability download

McGonagle, T., Bosch, L. van den, Buijs, D., Huang, M., Nazarski, M., Fahy, R., Poort, J. & Ulasiuk, I.
2023

audiovisual content, Media law, public interests

Bibtex

Report{nokey, title = {Public interest content on audiovisual platforms: access and findability}, author = {McGonagle, T. and Bosch, L. van den and Buijs, D. and Huang, M. and Nazarski, M. and Fahy, R. and Poort, J. and Ulasiuk, I.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/public-interest-content-on-audiovisual-platforms-access-and-findability/iris-special-2023-01/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-10-17}, keywords = {audiovisual content, Media law, public interests}, }

Opinie: De DSA en desinformatie: meer dan censuur alleen download

Mediaforum, num: 5, pp: 157, 2023

censuur, DSA

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Opinie: De DSA en desinformatie: meer dan censuur alleen}, author = {Leerssen, P.}, url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/opinie-de-dsa-en-desinformatie-meer-dan-censuur-alleen/opinie_mediaforum_2023_5/}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-11-17}, journal = {Mediaforum}, number = {5}, keywords = {censuur, DSA}, }

Generative AI and Author Remuneration

IIC, vol. 54, pp: 1535-1560, 2023

Abstract

With the evolution of generative AI systems, machine-made productions in the literary and artistic field have reached a level of refinement that allows them to replace human creations. The increasing sophistication of AI systems will inevitably disrupt the market for human literary and artistic works. Generative AI systems provide literary and artistic output much faster and cheaper. It is therefore foreseeable that human authors will be exposed to substitution effects. They may lose income as they are replaced by machines in sectors ranging from journalism and writing to music and visual arts. Considering this trend, the question arises whether it is advisable to take measures to compensate human authors for the reduction in their market share and income. Copyright law could serve as a tool to introduce an AI levy system and ensure the payment of equitable remuneration. In combination with mandatory collective rights management, the new revenue stream could be used to finance social and cultural funds that improve the working and living conditions of flesh-and-blood authors.

collective rights management, Copyright, Freedom of expression, text and data mining, three-step test

Bibtex

Article{nokey, title = {Generative AI and Author Remuneration}, author = {Senftleben, M.}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s40319-023-01399-4}, year = {2023}, date = {2023-11-07}, journal = {IIC}, volume = {54}, pages = {1535-1560}, abstract = {With the evolution of generative AI systems, machine-made productions in the literary and artistic field have reached a level of refinement that allows them to replace human creations. The increasing sophistication of AI systems will inevitably disrupt the market for human literary and artistic works. Generative AI systems provide literary and artistic output much faster and cheaper. It is therefore foreseeable that human authors will be exposed to substitution effects. They may lose income as they are replaced by machines in sectors ranging from journalism and writing to music and visual arts. Considering this trend, the question arises whether it is advisable to take measures to compensate human authors for the reduction in their market share and income. Copyright law could serve as a tool to introduce an AI levy system and ensure the payment of equitable remuneration. In combination with mandatory collective rights management, the new revenue stream could be used to finance social and cultural funds that improve the working and living conditions of flesh-and-blood authors.}, keywords = {collective rights management, Copyright, Freedom of expression, text and data mining, three-step test}, }