Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 19 december 2023

Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 19 december 2023 download

Nederlandse Jurisprudentie, iss. : 26, num: 234, pp: 5261-5262,

Abstract

Demonstratie in vliegtuig tegen uitzetting vreemdeling. 1. Art. 46 lid 2 onder b Vreemdelingenwet 2000 heeft ook betrekking op regels voor het beheersbaar maken en houden van de situatie ten behoeve van de grensbewaking, en art. 4.6 Vreemdelingenbesluit 2000 omvat de bevoegdheid om een aanwijzing te geven vanwege het zich op een voor de uitoefening van de grensbewaking hinderlijke wijze ophouden op of nabij een grensdoorlaatpost. 2. De verwerping van het verweer dat de verdachte moet worden ontslagen van alle rechtsvervolging vanwege onverenigbaarheid van de strafvervolging met art. 10 en art. 11 EVRM is niet onjuist en ook niet onbegrijpelijk.

Bibtex

Case note{nokey,
	title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 19 december 2023},
	author = {Dommering, E.},
	url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publications/annotatie-bij-hoge-raad-19-december-2023/annotatie_nj_2024_234/},
	year = {},
	date = {DATE ERROR: pub_date = },
	journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},
	issue = {26},
	number = {234},
	pages = {5261-5262},
	abstract = {Demonstratie in vliegtuig tegen uitzetting vreemdeling. 1. Art. 46 lid 2 onder b Vreemdelingenwet 2000 heeft ook betrekking op regels voor het beheersbaar maken en houden van de situatie ten behoeve van de grensbewaking, en art. 4.6 Vreemdelingenbesluit 2000 omvat de bevoegdheid om een aanwijzing te geven vanwege het zich op een voor de uitoefening van de grensbewaking hinderlijke wijze ophouden op of nabij een grensdoorlaatpost. 2. De verwerping van het verweer dat de verdachte moet worden ontslagen van alle rechtsvervolging vanwege onverenigbaarheid van de strafvervolging met art. 10 en art. 11 EVRM is niet onjuist en ook niet onbegrijpelijk.},
	keywords = {annotatie},
}

Explaining and Contesting Judicial Profiling Systems: Beyond a Procedural Right to an Explanation external link

Metikoš, L.

Technology and Regulation, pp: 188-208, 2024

Abstract

This paper argues that a right to an explanation can enable litigants to contest judicial profiling systems on various grounds. However, the technical opacity of certain types of systems, integrity concerns, and the rights and interests of third parties, can hinder the ability of courts to provide an explanation. To overcome these obstacles, a number of technical and organizational measures can be taken before and during the development of these systems, to ensure that they are contestable. This paper also critically interprets EU Data Protection Law, the right to a fair trial, and the AI-Act. It shows how these laws (partially) protect contestation by design, as well as their limitations and potential loopholes.

Bibtex

Article{nokey,
	title = {Explaining and Contesting Judicial Profiling Systems: Beyond a Procedural Right to an Explanation},
	author = {Metikoš, L.},
	url = {https://techreg.org/article/view/14217/21326},
	year = {2024},
	date = {2024-09-11},
	journal = {Technology and Regulation},
	pages = {188-208},
	abstract = {This paper argues that a right to an explanation can enable litigants to contest judicial profiling systems on various grounds. However, the technical opacity of certain types of systems, integrity concerns, and the rights and interests of third parties, can hinder the ability of courts to provide an explanation. To overcome these obstacles, a number of technical and organizational measures can be taken before and during the development of these systems, to ensure that they are contestable. This paper also critically interprets EU Data Protection Law, the right to a fair trial, and the AI-Act. It shows how these laws (partially) protect contestation by design, as well as their limitations and potential loopholes.},
}

Silence can be as explicit as words. The AG’s Opinion in Kwantum v. Vitra external link

Hugenholtz, P.

Kluwer Copyright Blog, 2024

Links
Bibtex

Bibtex

Raise or fold? Verhoging van de kansspelbelasting en de impact op de publieke belangen download

Halbersma, R., Poort, J. & Burema, F.

2024

Links
Bibtex

Bibtex

From Encryption to Quantum Computing – The Governance of Information Security and Human Rights external link

van Daalen, O.

T.M.C. Asser Press, 2024, Series: Information Technology and Law (IT&Law) Series, Edition: 38, ISBN: 978-94-6265-634-5

Brave New World: Out-Of-Court Dispute Settlement Bodies and the Struggle to Adjudicate Platforms in Europe external link

Ruschemeier, H., Quintais, J., Nenadić, I., De Gregorio, G. & Eder, N.

Verfassungsblog, 2024

Links
Bibtex

Bibtex

Prompts tussen vorm en inhoud: de eerste rechtspraak over generatieve AI en het werk download

Hugenholtz, P.

Auteursrecht, iss. : 3, pp: 129-134, 2024

Abstract

Kan het gebruik van generatieve AI-systemen een auteursrechtelijk beschermd werk opleveren? Twee jaar na de introductie van Dall-E en ChatGPT begint zich enige jurisprudentie te vormen. Daarbij is de kernvraag of het aansturen van dergelijke systemen door middel van prompts (instructies) voldoende is om de output als ‘werk’ te kwalificeren. Dit artikel gaat, mede aan de hand van de vroegste rechtspraak in de Verenigde Staten, China en Europa, dieper in op deze lastige kwestie.

Bibtex

Private copying levies, broadcasters and the principle of equal treatment – C-260/22 Seven.One Entertainment Group v Corint Media external link

Szkalej, K.

Bibtex

Gederfd woongenot: Een exploratief onderzoek naar gederfd woongenot als gevolg van aardbevingen en aardbevingsrisico’s in Groningen download

Poort, J., Mandemakers, J. & Veldkamp, J.

2024

Links
Bibtex

Bibtex

Algorithmic propagation: How the data-platform regulatory framework may increase bias in content moderation external link

Margoni, T., Quintais, J. & Schwemer, S.

Forthcoming in: Caterina Sganga & Tatiana Eleni Synodinou (Eds), Flexibilities in Copyright Law, Routledge, 2025,

Abstract

This chapter offers a reflection on the topic of content moderation and bias mitigation measures in copyright law. It explores the possible links between conditional data access regimes and content moderation performed through data-intensive technologies such as fingerprinting and machine learning algorithms. In recent years, various pressing questions surrounding automated decision-making and their legal implications materialised. In European Union (EU) law, answers were provided through different regulatory interventions often based on specific legal categories, rights, and foundations contributing to the increasing complexity of interacting frameworks. Within this broader background, the chapter discusses whether current EU copyright rules may have the effect of favouring what we call the propagation of bias present in input data to the output algorithmic tools employed for content moderation. The chapter shows that a reduced availability and transparency of training data often leads to negative effects on access, verification and replication of results. These are ideal conditions for the development of bias and other types of systematic errors to the detriment of users' rights. The chapter discusses a number of options that could be employed to mitigate this undesirable effect and contextually preserve the many fundamental rights at stake.

Bibtex

Chapter{nokey,
	title = {Algorithmic propagation: How the data-platform regulatory framework may increase bias in content moderation},
	author = {Margoni, T. and Quintais, J. and Schwemer, S.},
	url = {https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4913758},
	year = {},
	date = {DATE ERROR: pub_date = },
	abstract = {This chapter offers a reflection on the topic of content moderation and bias mitigation measures in copyright law. It explores the possible links between conditional data access regimes and content moderation performed through data-intensive technologies such as fingerprinting and machine learning algorithms. In recent years, various pressing questions surrounding automated decision-making and their legal implications materialised. In European Union (EU) law, answers were provided through different regulatory interventions often based on specific legal categories, rights, and foundations contributing to the increasing complexity of interacting frameworks. Within this broader background, the chapter discusses whether current EU copyright rules may have the effect of favouring what we call the propagation of bias present in input data to the output algorithmic tools employed for content moderation. The chapter shows that a reduced availability and transparency of training data often leads to negative effects on access, verification and replication of results. These are ideal conditions for the development of bias and other types of systematic errors to the detriment of users\' rights. The chapter discusses a number of options that could be employed to mitigate this undesirable effect and contextually preserve the many fundamental rights at stake.},
}

Publications

Top Keywords