kroniek, Mediarecht
Article{Breemen2017b,
title = {Kroniek Mediarecht},
author = {Breemen, V.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AA_143.pdf},
year = {0908},
date = {2017-09-08},
journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi},
volume = {2017},
number = {143},
pages = {8358-8361},
keywords = {kroniek, Mediarecht},
} kroniek, Mediarecht
Article{Breemen2017b,
title = {Kroniek Mediarecht},
author = {Breemen, V.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/AA_144.pdf},
year = {0908},
date = {2017-09-08},
journal = {KwartaalSignaal Ars Aequi},
volume = {2017},
number = {144},
pages = {8427-8429},
keywords = {kroniek, Mediarecht},
} chilling effect, defamation, electronic publishing, Freedom of expression, frontpage, Human rights, liability, online reader comments
Article{Fahy2017b,
title = {The Chilling Effect of Liability for Online Reader Comments},
author = {Fahy, R.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EHRLR_2017_4.pdf},
year = {0824},
date = {2017-08-24},
journal = {European Human Rights Law Review},
volume = {2017},
number = {4},
pages = {387-393},
abstract = {This article assesses how the European Court of Human Rights has responded to the argument that holding online news media liable for reader comments has a chilling effect on freedom of expression. The article demonstrates how the Court first responded by dismissing the argument, and focused on the apparent lack of evidence for any such chilling effect. The article then argues that the Court has moved away from its initial rejection, and now accepts that a potential chilling effect, even without evidence, is integral to deciding whether online news media should be liable for reader comments. Finally, the article argues that this latter view is consistent with the Court’s precedent in other areas of
freedom of expression law where a similar chilling effect may also arise.},
keywords = {chilling effect, defamation, electronic publishing, Freedom of expression, frontpage, Human rights, liability, online reader comments},
} frontpage, recht op eerbiediging van privéleven, Vrijheid van meningsuiting
Article{Fahy2017b,
title = {Annotatie bij Europees Hof voor de Rechten van de Mens 21 februari 2017 (Dosamantes / Spanje)},
author = {Fahy, R.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/EHRC_2017_7.pdf},
year = {0824},
date = {2017-08-24},
journal = {European Human Right Cases},
volume = {2017},
number = {7},
pages = {},
keywords = {frontpage, recht op eerbiediging van privéleven, Vrijheid van meningsuiting},
} data, intellectual property law
Chapter{Hugenholtz2017,
title = {Against ‘Data Property’},
author = {Hugenholtz, P.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Against_Data_Property_Kritika_chapter.pdf},
year = {0904},
date = {2018-09-04},
abstract = {This chapter argues against the idea of a ‘data producer’s right’. Introducing a property right in machine-generated data would seriously compromise the system of intellectual property law that currently exists in Europe. It would also contravene fundamental freedoms enshrined in the European Convention on Human Rights and the EU Charter, distort freedom of competition and freedom of services in the EU, restrict scientific freedoms and generally undercut the promise of big data for European economy and society.},
keywords = {data, intellectual property law},
} nationale veiligheid, open brief, waarborgen
Online publication{vanEijk2016b,
title = {Open brief aan Tweede Kamer: Onvoldoende waarborgen in nieuwe nationale veiligheidswet},
author = {van Eijk, N.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/nl/open-brief-aan-tweede-kamer-onvoldoende-waarborgen-nieuwe-nationale-veiligheidswet/},
year = {1213},
date = {2016-12-13},
keywords = {nationale veiligheid, open brief, waarborgen},
} book review, Data protection, ethics, phenomenology, presence, Privacy, property
Article{Sax2017,
title = {Book Review: The Crisis of Presence in Contemporary Culture},
author = {Sax, M.},
url = {https://edpl.lexxion.eu/article/EDPL/2017/2/27},
doi = {https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2017/2/27},
year = {0801},
date = {2017-08-01},
journal = {European Data Protection Law Review},
volume = {3},
number = {2},
pages = {293-296},
keywords = {book review, Data protection, ethics, phenomenology, presence, Privacy, property},
} behavioural targeting, cookies, Data protection law, frontpage, General Data Protection Regulation, personalized communication, Price discrimination
Article{Borgesius2017b,
title = {Online Price Discrimination and EU Data Privacy Law},
author = {Zuiderveen Borgesius, F. and Poort, J.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/JCP_2017.pdf},
doi = {https://doi.org/DOI 10.1007/s10603-017-9354-z},
year = {0725},
date = {2017-07-25},
journal = {Journal of Consumer Policy},
volume = {2017},
pages = {},
abstract = {Online shops could offer each website customer a different price. Such personalized pricing can lead to advanced forms of price discrimination based on individual characteristics of consumers, which may be provided, obtained, or assumed. An online shop can recognize customers, for instance through cookies, and categorize them as price-sensitive or price-insensitive. Subsequently, it can charge (presumed) price-insensitive people higher prices. This paper explores personalized pricing from a
legal and an economic perspective. From an economic perspective, there are valid arguments in favour of price discrimination, but its effect on total consumer welfare is ambiguous. Irrespectively, many people regard personalized pricing as unfair or
manipulative. The paper analyses how this dislike of personalized pricing may be linked to economic analysis and to other norms or values. Next, the paper examines whether European data protection law applies to personalized pricing. Data protection law applies if personal data are processed, and this paper argues that that is generally the case when prices are personalized. Data protection law requires companies to be transparent about the purpose of personal data processing, which implies that they must inform customers if they personalize prices. Subsequently, consumers have to give consent. If enforced, data protection law could thereby play a significant role in mitigating any adverse effects of personalized pricing. It could help to unearth how prevalent personalized pricing is and how people respond to transparency about it.},
keywords = {behavioural targeting, cookies, Data protection law, frontpage, General Data Protection Regulation, personalized communication, Price discrimination},
} China, cybersecurity
Article{tenBrink2017,
title = {China’s new cybersecurity law – effective as of 1 June 2017},
author = {Staden ten Brink, R. van and Wang, J. and Veldhoen, D. and Arnbak, A.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/TSJ_2017_2.pdf},
year = {0721},
date = {2017-07-21},
journal = {Trade Security Journal},
volume = {2017},
number = {2},
pages = {27-29},
abstract = {While China’s new cybersecurity law may appear vague, cumbersome and lacking clarity, one thing is clear and that is that international companies with any operations and/or activities in China should quickly assess if and how they are covered by the new legislation.},
keywords = {China, cybersecurity},
} artikel 10 EVRM, frontpage, mein kampf, Strafrecht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting
Article{Dommering2017b,
title = {Annotatie bij Hoge Raad 14 februari 2017 (Mein Kampf)},
author = {Dommering, E.},
url = {https://www.ivir.nl/publicaties/download/Annotatie_NJ_2017_259.pdf},
year = {0718},
date = {2017-07-18},
journal = {Nederlandse Jurisprudentie},
volume = {2017},
number = {28},
pages = {4119-4121},
abstract = {Verspreiding antiquarisch exemplaar Mein Kampf valt wel onder 137e 2e Sr, maar is niet strafbaar omdat de beperking in strijd komt met artikel 10 EVRM.},
keywords = {artikel 10 EVRM, frontpage, mein kampf, Strafrecht, Vrijheid van meningsuiting},
}